Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts
The article considers the relationship between Albrecht Ritschl and Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is argued that beyond the frequent polemics there is both genuine, fundamental agreement and equally fundamental disagreement between the two theologians. Ritschl accepted that Schleiermacher’s ethical i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2005
|
| _version_ | 1797098004445921280 |
|---|---|
| author | Zachhuber, J |
| author_facet | Zachhuber, J |
| author_sort | Zachhuber, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The article considers the relationship between Albrecht Ritschl and Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is argued that beyond the frequent polemics there is both genuine, fundamental agreement and equally fundamental disagreement between the two theologians. Ritschl accepted that Schleiermacher’s ethical insight in the specific interaction of individual and community was pivotal for his own theology, while averring that Schleiermacher had failed to share Kant’s sharp ontological dualism of nature and spirit. This finding leads to farreaching questions concerning the continuity and discontinuity in 19th-century theological development as well as today’s theological options in the reception of Schleiermacher. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:03:27Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:d91bb0b2-15a0-47a6-9a58-c402fa324135 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:03:27Z |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:d91bb0b2-15a0-47a6-9a58-c402fa3241352022-03-27T08:53:29ZFriedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. JahrhundertsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d91bb0b2-15a0-47a6-9a58-c402fa324135Symplectic Elements at OxfordDe Gruyter2005Zachhuber, JThe article considers the relationship between Albrecht Ritschl and Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is argued that beyond the frequent polemics there is both genuine, fundamental agreement and equally fundamental disagreement between the two theologians. Ritschl accepted that Schleiermacher’s ethical insight in the specific interaction of individual and community was pivotal for his own theology, while averring that Schleiermacher had failed to share Kant’s sharp ontological dualism of nature and spirit. This finding leads to farreaching questions concerning the continuity and discontinuity in 19th-century theological development as well as today’s theological options in the reception of Schleiermacher. |
| spellingShingle | Zachhuber, J Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title | Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title_full | Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title_fullStr | Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title_full_unstemmed | Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title_short | Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts |
| title_sort | friedrich schleiermacher und albrecht ritschl kontinuitaten und diskontinuitaten in der theologie des 19 jahrhunderts |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zachhuberj friedrichschleiermacherundalbrechtritschlkontinuitatenunddiskontinuitatenindertheologiedes19jahrhunderts |