Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?

We compare the most common methods for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly: a simple simultaneous auction, and a sequential process in which potential buyers decide in turn whether or not to enter the bidding. The sequential process is always more efficient. But pre-emptive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bulow, J, Klemperer, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American Economic Association 2009
_version_ 1826299546490109952
author Bulow, J
Klemperer, P
author_facet Bulow, J
Klemperer, P
author_sort Bulow, J
collection OXFORD
description We compare the most common methods for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly: a simple simultaneous auction, and a sequential process in which potential buyers decide in turn whether or not to enter the bidding. The sequential process is always more efficient. But pre-emptive bids transfer surplus from the seller to buyers. Because the auction is more conducive to entry - precisely because of its inefficiency - it usually generates higher expected revenue. We also discuss the effects of lock-ups, matching rights, break-up fees (as in takeover battles), entry subsidies, etc.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d9251c6c-a549-4aaa-ab4e-960ca9ad827f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:34Z
publishDate 2009
publisher American Economic Association
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d9251c6c-a549-4aaa-ab4e-960ca9ad827f2022-03-27T08:53:47ZWhy Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d9251c6c-a549-4aaa-ab4e-960ca9ad827fEnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsAmerican Economic Association2009Bulow, JKlemperer, PWe compare the most common methods for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly: a simple simultaneous auction, and a sequential process in which potential buyers decide in turn whether or not to enter the bidding. The sequential process is always more efficient. But pre-emptive bids transfer surplus from the seller to buyers. Because the auction is more conducive to entry - precisely because of its inefficiency - it usually generates higher expected revenue. We also discuss the effects of lock-ups, matching rights, break-up fees (as in takeover battles), entry subsidies, etc.
spellingShingle Bulow, J
Klemperer, P
Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title_full Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title_fullStr Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title_full_unstemmed Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title_short Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions?
title_sort why do sellers usually prefer auctions
work_keys_str_mv AT bulowj whydosellersusuallypreferauctions
AT klempererp whydosellersusuallypreferauctions