Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents

In philosophy of mind, zombies are imaginary creatures that are exact physical duplicates of conscious subjects for whom there is no first-personal experience. Zombies are meant to show that physicalism—the theory that the universe is made up entirely out of physical components—is false. In this pap...

Disgrifiad llawn

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Prif Awdur: Véliz, C
Fformat: Journal article
Iaith:English
Cyhoeddwyd: Springer 2021
_version_ 1826299563736039424
author Véliz, C
author_facet Véliz, C
author_sort Véliz, C
collection OXFORD
description In philosophy of mind, zombies are imaginary creatures that are exact physical duplicates of conscious subjects for whom there is no first-personal experience. Zombies are meant to show that physicalism—the theory that the universe is made up entirely out of physical components—is false. In this paper, I apply the zombie thought experiment to the realm of morality to assess whether moral agency is something independent from sentience. Algorithms, I argue, are a kind of functional moral zombie, such that thinking about the latter can help us better understand and regulate the former. I contend that the main reason why algorithms can be neither autonomous nor accountable is that they lack sentience. Moral zombies and algorithms are incoherent as moral agents because they lack the necessary moral understanding to be morally responsible. To understand what it means to inflict pain on someone, it is necessary to have experiential knowledge of pain. At most, for an algorithm that feels nothing, ‘values’ will be items on a list, possibly prioritised in a certain way according to a number that represents weightiness. But entities that do not feel cannot value, and beings that do not value cannot act for moral reasons.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:50Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d93dd717-b004-4280-861a-8f93a82eceb6
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:50Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d93dd717-b004-4280-861a-8f93a82eceb62022-03-27T08:54:25ZMoral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agentsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d93dd717-b004-4280-861a-8f93a82eceb6EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer2021Véliz, CIn philosophy of mind, zombies are imaginary creatures that are exact physical duplicates of conscious subjects for whom there is no first-personal experience. Zombies are meant to show that physicalism—the theory that the universe is made up entirely out of physical components—is false. In this paper, I apply the zombie thought experiment to the realm of morality to assess whether moral agency is something independent from sentience. Algorithms, I argue, are a kind of functional moral zombie, such that thinking about the latter can help us better understand and regulate the former. I contend that the main reason why algorithms can be neither autonomous nor accountable is that they lack sentience. Moral zombies and algorithms are incoherent as moral agents because they lack the necessary moral understanding to be morally responsible. To understand what it means to inflict pain on someone, it is necessary to have experiential knowledge of pain. At most, for an algorithm that feels nothing, ‘values’ will be items on a list, possibly prioritised in a certain way according to a number that represents weightiness. But entities that do not feel cannot value, and beings that do not value cannot act for moral reasons.
spellingShingle Véliz, C
Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title_full Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title_fullStr Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title_full_unstemmed Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title_short Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents
title_sort moral zombies why algorithms are not moral agents
work_keys_str_mv AT velizc moralzombieswhyalgorithmsarenotmoralagents