Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus
<h4>Background</h4> <p>This paper reports the process and outcome of a consensus finding project, which began with a meeting at the Brocher Foundation in May 2015. The project sought to generate and reach consensus on standards of practice for Empirical Bioethics research. The pro...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826299775059755008 |
|---|---|
| author | Ives, J Dunn, M Molewijk, B Schildmann, J Bærøe, K Frith, L Huxtable, R Landeweer, E Mertz, M Provoost, V Rid, A Salloch, S Sheehan, M Strech, D De Vries, M Widdershoven, G |
| author_facet | Ives, J Dunn, M Molewijk, B Schildmann, J Bærøe, K Frith, L Huxtable, R Landeweer, E Mertz, M Provoost, V Rid, A Salloch, S Sheehan, M Strech, D De Vries, M Widdershoven, G |
| author_sort | Ives, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <h4>Background</h4> <p>This paper reports the process and outcome of a consensus finding project, which began with a meeting at the Brocher Foundation in May 2015. The project sought to generate and reach consensus on standards of practice for Empirical Bioethics research. The project involved 16 academics from 5 different European Countries, with a range of disciplinary backgrounds.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The consensus process used a modified Delphi approach.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Consensus was reached on 15 standards of practice, organised into 6 domains of research practice (Aims, Questions, Integration, Conduct of Empirical Work, Conduct of Normative Work; Training & Expertise).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Through articulating these standards we outline a position that encourages responses, and through those responses we will be able to identify points of agreement and contestation that will drive the conversation forward. In that vein, we would encourage researchers, funders and journals to engage with what we have proposed, and respond to us, so that our community of practice of empirical bioethics research can develop and evolve further.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:07:04Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:da48e195-1ebd-4a20-8e8e-13b354b4bb75 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:07:04Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:da48e195-1ebd-4a20-8e8e-13b354b4bb752022-03-27T09:02:11ZStandards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensusJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:da48e195-1ebd-4a20-8e8e-13b354b4bb75EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2018Ives, JDunn, MMolewijk, BSchildmann, JBærøe, KFrith, LHuxtable, RLandeweer, EMertz, MProvoost, VRid, ASalloch, SSheehan, MStrech, DDe Vries, MWiddershoven, G <h4>Background</h4> <p>This paper reports the process and outcome of a consensus finding project, which began with a meeting at the Brocher Foundation in May 2015. The project sought to generate and reach consensus on standards of practice for Empirical Bioethics research. The project involved 16 academics from 5 different European Countries, with a range of disciplinary backgrounds.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The consensus process used a modified Delphi approach.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Consensus was reached on 15 standards of practice, organised into 6 domains of research practice (Aims, Questions, Integration, Conduct of Empirical Work, Conduct of Normative Work; Training & Expertise).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Through articulating these standards we outline a position that encourages responses, and through those responses we will be able to identify points of agreement and contestation that will drive the conversation forward. In that vein, we would encourage researchers, funders and journals to engage with what we have proposed, and respond to us, so that our community of practice of empirical bioethics research can develop and evolve further.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Ives, J Dunn, M Molewijk, B Schildmann, J Bærøe, K Frith, L Huxtable, R Landeweer, E Mertz, M Provoost, V Rid, A Salloch, S Sheehan, M Strech, D De Vries, M Widdershoven, G Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title | Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title_full | Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title_fullStr | Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title_short | Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus |
| title_sort | standards of practice in empirical bioethics research towards a consensus |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ivesj standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT dunnm standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT molewijkb standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT schildmannj standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT bærøek standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT frithl standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT huxtabler standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT landeweere standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT mertzm standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT provoostv standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT rida standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT sallochs standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT sheehanm standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT strechd standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT devriesm standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus AT widdershoveng standardsofpracticeinempiricalbioethicsresearchtowardsaconsensus |