Does double-blind review favor female authors? Reply

Does double-blind review favor female authors? Reply

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Budden, A, Aarssen, L, Koricheva, J, Leimu, R, Lortie, C, Tregenza, T
Format:	Journal article
Published:	2008

Similar Items

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Response to Webb et al.: Double-blind review: accept with minor revisions
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Does it pay to have a "bigwig" as a co-author?
by: Leimu, R, et al.
Published: (2008)

Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
by: Aarssen, L, et al.
Published: (2009)

Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
by: Aarssen, L, et al.
Published: (2009)

How big are bigwigs?: a reply to Havens
by: Leimu, R, et al.
Published: (2008)

To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
by: Borsuk, R, et al.
Published: (2009)

Response to Whittaker: challenges in testing for gender bias
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Publication bias and merit in ecology
by: Lortie, C, et al.
Published: (2007)

Systematic variation in reviewer practice according to country and gender in the field of ecology and evolution.
by: Grod, O, et al.
Published: (2008)

The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology
by: Borsuk, R, et al.
Published: (2009)

Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology
by: Lortie, C, et al.
Published: (2012)

Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology.
by: Lortie, C, et al.
Published: (2013)

Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles?
by: Leimu, R, et al.
Published: (2005)

Does the US Tax Code Favor Automation?
by: Acemoglu, Daron, et al.
Published: (2022)

Reply to author
by: Thao, L, et al.
Published: (2018)

The authors reply
by: Kheifets, L, et al.
Published: (2011)

The authors reply
by: Bejon, P, et al.
Published: (2009)

Authors' reply
by: Seymour, M, et al.
Published: (2011)

The authors reply
by: Moers, C, et al.
Published: (2009)

Authors' reply
by: Heneghan, C, et al.
Published: (2012)

Authors' reply
by: Kapur, N, et al.
Published: (2017)

The authors reply
by: Wilcock, G, et al.
Published: (2003)

Authors' reply
by: Herbert, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

The authors reply
by: Van Vinh Chau, N, et al.
Published: (2012)

Authors' reply
by: Wiles, N, et al.
Published: (2013)

The authors reply
by: Holman, R, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Aveyard, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: West, S, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Craddock, N, et al.
Published: (2008)

Author's reply
by: Freeman, D
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Aveyard, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

The authors reply
by: Clatworthy, MR, et al.
Published: (2008)

The authors reply
by: Jha, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply:
by: Garety, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Khan, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Authors' reply
by: Leucht, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

The authors reply
by: Holman, R, et al.
Published: (2009)

The authors reply
by: Rahman, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

The authors' reply
by: Hobbs, F, et al.
Published: (2011)