Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay

The role of particular scientists in opposing policies to slow and halt global warming has been extensively documented. The role of economists, however, has received less attention. Here, I trace the history of an influential group of economic consultants hired by the petroleum industry from the 199...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Franta, B
Natura: Journal article
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Taylor and Francis 2021
_version_ 1826311778761441280
author Franta, B
author_facet Franta, B
author_sort Franta, B
collection OXFORD
description The role of particular scientists in opposing policies to slow and halt global warming has been extensively documented. The role of economists, however, has received less attention. Here, I trace the history of an influential group of economic consultants hired by the petroleum industry from the 1990s to the 2010s to estimate the costs of various proposed climate policies. The economists used models that inflated predicted costs while ignoring policy benefits, and their results were often portrayed to the public as independent rather than industry-sponsored. Their work played a key role in undermining numerous major climate policy initiatives in the US over a span of decades, including carbon pricing and participation in international climate agreements. This study illustrates how the fossil fuel industry has funded biased economic analyses to oppose climate policy and highlights the need for greater attention on the role of economists and economic paradigms, doctrines, and models in climate policy delay.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:14:46Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:daded5cf-7c0f-45b6-8e76-274bba15d1b3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:14:46Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:daded5cf-7c0f-45b6-8e76-274bba15d1b32023-12-15T06:21:41ZWeaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delayJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:daded5cf-7c0f-45b6-8e76-274bba15d1b3EnglishSymplectic ElementsTaylor and Francis2021Franta, BThe role of particular scientists in opposing policies to slow and halt global warming has been extensively documented. The role of economists, however, has received less attention. Here, I trace the history of an influential group of economic consultants hired by the petroleum industry from the 1990s to the 2010s to estimate the costs of various proposed climate policies. The economists used models that inflated predicted costs while ignoring policy benefits, and their results were often portrayed to the public as independent rather than industry-sponsored. Their work played a key role in undermining numerous major climate policy initiatives in the US over a span of decades, including carbon pricing and participation in international climate agreements. This study illustrates how the fossil fuel industry has funded biased economic analyses to oppose climate policy and highlights the need for greater attention on the role of economists and economic paradigms, doctrines, and models in climate policy delay.
spellingShingle Franta, B
Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title_full Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title_fullStr Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title_full_unstemmed Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title_short Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay
title_sort weaponizing economics big oil economic consultants and climate policy delay
work_keys_str_mv AT frantab weaponizingeconomicsbigoileconomicconsultantsandclimatepolicydelay