A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda

The need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes is widely recognised. However, the science-policy relationship is sometimes difficult and occasionally dysfunctional; it is also increasingly visible, because it must deal with contentious issues, or i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sutherland, W, Bellingan, L, Bellingham, JR, Blackstock, J, Bloomfield, R, Bravo, M, Cadman, V, Cleevely, D, Clements, A, Cohen, A, Cope, DR, Daemmrich, A, Devecchi, C, Anadon, L, Denegri, S, Doubleday, R, Dusic, N, Evans, R, Feng, W, Godfray, H, Harris, P, Hartley, SE, Hester, A, Holmes, J, Hughes, A, Hulme, M, Irwin, C, Jennings, R, Kass, G, Littlejohns, P, Marteau, T, McKee, G, Millstone, E, Nuttall, W, Owens, S, Parker, M, Pearson, S, Petts, J, Ploszek, R, Pullin, A, Reid, G, Richards, K, Robinson, J, Shaxson, L, Sierra, L, Smith, BG, Spiegelhalter, D, Stilgoe, J, Stirling, A, Tyler, C, Winickoff, D, Zimmern, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2012
_version_ 1826300008546172928
author Sutherland, W
Bellingan, L
Bellingham, JR
Blackstock, J
Bloomfield, R
Bravo, M
Cadman, V
Cleevely, D
Clements, A
Cohen, A
Cope, DR
Daemmrich, A
Devecchi, C
Anadon, L
Denegri, S
Doubleday, R
Dusic, N
Evans, R
Feng, W
Godfray, H
Harris, P
Hartley, SE
Hester, A
Holmes, J
Hughes, A
Hulme, M
Irwin, C
Jennings, R
Kass, G
Littlejohns, P
Marteau, T
McKee, G
Millstone, E
Nuttall, W
Owens, S
Parker, M
Pearson, S
Petts, J
Ploszek, R
Pullin, A
Reid, G
Richards, K
Robinson, J
Shaxson, L
Sierra, L
Smith, BG
Spiegelhalter, D
Stilgoe, J
Stirling, A
Tyler, C
Winickoff, D
Zimmern, R
author_facet Sutherland, W
Bellingan, L
Bellingham, JR
Blackstock, J
Bloomfield, R
Bravo, M
Cadman, V
Cleevely, D
Clements, A
Cohen, A
Cope, DR
Daemmrich, A
Devecchi, C
Anadon, L
Denegri, S
Doubleday, R
Dusic, N
Evans, R
Feng, W
Godfray, H
Harris, P
Hartley, SE
Hester, A
Holmes, J
Hughes, A
Hulme, M
Irwin, C
Jennings, R
Kass, G
Littlejohns, P
Marteau, T
McKee, G
Millstone, E
Nuttall, W
Owens, S
Parker, M
Pearson, S
Petts, J
Ploszek, R
Pullin, A
Reid, G
Richards, K
Robinson, J
Shaxson, L
Sierra, L
Smith, BG
Spiegelhalter, D
Stilgoe, J
Stirling, A
Tyler, C
Winickoff, D
Zimmern, R
author_sort Sutherland, W
collection OXFORD
description The need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes is widely recognised. However, the science-policy relationship is sometimes difficult and occasionally dysfunctional; it is also increasingly visible, because it must deal with contentious issues, or itself becomes a matter of public controversy, or both. We suggest that identifying key unanswered questions on the relationship between science and policy will catalyse and focus research in this field. To identify these questions, a collaborative procedure was employed with 52 participants selected to cover a wide range of experience in both science and policy, including people from government, non-governmental organisations, academia and industry. These participants consulted with colleagues and submitted 239 questions. An initial round of voting was followed by a workshop in which 40 of the most important questions were identified by further discussion and voting. The resulting list includes questions about the effectiveness of science-based decision-making structures; the nature and legitimacy of expertise; the consequences of changes such as increasing transparency; choices among different sources of evidence; the implications of new means of characterising and representing uncertainties; and ways in which policy and political processes affect what counts as authoritative evidence. We expect this exercise to identify important theoretical questions and to help improve the mutual understanding and effectiveness of those working at the interface of science and policy.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:10:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:db6b747b-be1e-4b7d-98ef-cfdf04421263
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:10:36Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:db6b747b-be1e-4b7d-98ef-cfdf044212632022-03-27T09:10:35ZA collaboratively-derived science-policy research agendaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:db6b747b-be1e-4b7d-98ef-cfdf04421263EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2012Sutherland, WBellingan, LBellingham, JRBlackstock, JBloomfield, RBravo, MCadman, VCleevely, DClements, ACohen, ACope, DRDaemmrich, ADevecchi, CAnadon, LDenegri, SDoubleday, RDusic, NEvans, RFeng, WGodfray, HHarris, PHartley, SEHester, AHolmes, JHughes, AHulme, MIrwin, CJennings, RKass, GLittlejohns, PMarteau, TMcKee, GMillstone, ENuttall, WOwens, SParker, MPearson, SPetts, JPloszek, RPullin, AReid, GRichards, KRobinson, JShaxson, LSierra, LSmith, BGSpiegelhalter, DStilgoe, JStirling, ATyler, CWinickoff, DZimmern, RThe need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes is widely recognised. However, the science-policy relationship is sometimes difficult and occasionally dysfunctional; it is also increasingly visible, because it must deal with contentious issues, or itself becomes a matter of public controversy, or both. We suggest that identifying key unanswered questions on the relationship between science and policy will catalyse and focus research in this field. To identify these questions, a collaborative procedure was employed with 52 participants selected to cover a wide range of experience in both science and policy, including people from government, non-governmental organisations, academia and industry. These participants consulted with colleagues and submitted 239 questions. An initial round of voting was followed by a workshop in which 40 of the most important questions were identified by further discussion and voting. The resulting list includes questions about the effectiveness of science-based decision-making structures; the nature and legitimacy of expertise; the consequences of changes such as increasing transparency; choices among different sources of evidence; the implications of new means of characterising and representing uncertainties; and ways in which policy and political processes affect what counts as authoritative evidence. We expect this exercise to identify important theoretical questions and to help improve the mutual understanding and effectiveness of those working at the interface of science and policy.
spellingShingle Sutherland, W
Bellingan, L
Bellingham, JR
Blackstock, J
Bloomfield, R
Bravo, M
Cadman, V
Cleevely, D
Clements, A
Cohen, A
Cope, DR
Daemmrich, A
Devecchi, C
Anadon, L
Denegri, S
Doubleday, R
Dusic, N
Evans, R
Feng, W
Godfray, H
Harris, P
Hartley, SE
Hester, A
Holmes, J
Hughes, A
Hulme, M
Irwin, C
Jennings, R
Kass, G
Littlejohns, P
Marteau, T
McKee, G
Millstone, E
Nuttall, W
Owens, S
Parker, M
Pearson, S
Petts, J
Ploszek, R
Pullin, A
Reid, G
Richards, K
Robinson, J
Shaxson, L
Sierra, L
Smith, BG
Spiegelhalter, D
Stilgoe, J
Stirling, A
Tyler, C
Winickoff, D
Zimmern, R
A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title_full A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title_fullStr A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title_full_unstemmed A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title_short A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
title_sort collaboratively derived science policy research agenda
work_keys_str_mv AT sutherlandw acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bellinganl acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bellinghamjr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT blackstockj acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bloomfieldr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bravom acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cadmanv acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cleevelyd acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT clementsa acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cohena acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT copedr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT daemmricha acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT devecchic acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT anadonl acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT denegris acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT doubledayr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT dusicn acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT evansr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT fengw acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT godfrayh acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT harrisp acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hartleyse acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hestera acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT holmesj acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hughesa acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hulmem acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT irwinc acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT jenningsr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT kassg acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT littlejohnsp acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT marteaut acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT mckeeg acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT millstonee acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT nuttallw acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT owenss acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT parkerm acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pearsons acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pettsj acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT ploszekr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pullina acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT reidg acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT richardsk acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT robinsonj acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT shaxsonl acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT sierral acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT smithbg acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT spiegelhalterd acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT stilgoej acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT stirlinga acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT tylerc acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT winickoffd acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT zimmernr acollaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT sutherlandw collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bellinganl collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bellinghamjr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT blackstockj collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bloomfieldr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT bravom collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cadmanv collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cleevelyd collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT clementsa collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT cohena collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT copedr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT daemmricha collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT devecchic collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT anadonl collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT denegris collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT doubledayr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT dusicn collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT evansr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT fengw collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT godfrayh collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT harrisp collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hartleyse collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hestera collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT holmesj collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hughesa collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT hulmem collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT irwinc collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT jenningsr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT kassg collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT littlejohnsp collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT marteaut collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT mckeeg collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT millstonee collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT nuttallw collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT owenss collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT parkerm collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pearsons collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pettsj collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT ploszekr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT pullina collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT reidg collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT richardsk collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT robinsonj collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT shaxsonl collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT sierral collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT smithbg collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT spiegelhalterd collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT stilgoej collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT stirlinga collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT tylerc collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT winickoffd collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda
AT zimmernr collaborativelyderivedsciencepolicyresearchagenda