The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.

The study examined whether screen size (10 degrees vs 19 degrees dia.) and separation (3 degrees vs 10 degrees eccentricity of inner edges) affect the estimates of acuity obtained with 1-3 month infants tested by forced-choice preferential looking. One and 2-month infants (but not 3-month olds) show...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
主要な著者: Atkinson, J, Pimm-Smith, E, Evans, C, Braddick, O
フォーマット: Journal article
言語:English
出版事項: 1983
_version_ 1826300069350998016
author Atkinson, J
Pimm-Smith, E
Evans, C
Braddick, O
author_facet Atkinson, J
Pimm-Smith, E
Evans, C
Braddick, O
author_sort Atkinson, J
collection OXFORD
description The study examined whether screen size (10 degrees vs 19 degrees dia.) and separation (3 degrees vs 10 degrees eccentricity of inner edges) affect the estimates of acuity obtained with 1-3 month infants tested by forced-choice preferential looking. One and 2-month infants (but not 3-month olds) showed higher acuity estimates with the larger screens. Screen separation did not significantly affect acuity estimates for any of the age groups. Possible factors underlying these results are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:11:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:dbb8ddee-4bcc-4dee-a69b-8ef00b47fa43
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:11:32Z
publishDate 1983
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:dbb8ddee-4bcc-4dee-a69b-8ef00b47fa432022-03-27T09:12:31ZThe effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:dbb8ddee-4bcc-4dee-a69b-8ef00b47fa43EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1983Atkinson, JPimm-Smith, EEvans, CBraddick, OThe study examined whether screen size (10 degrees vs 19 degrees dia.) and separation (3 degrees vs 10 degrees eccentricity of inner edges) affect the estimates of acuity obtained with 1-3 month infants tested by forced-choice preferential looking. One and 2-month infants (but not 3-month olds) showed higher acuity estimates with the larger screens. Screen separation did not significantly affect acuity estimates for any of the age groups. Possible factors underlying these results are discussed.
spellingShingle Atkinson, J
Pimm-Smith, E
Evans, C
Braddick, O
The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title_full The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title_fullStr The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title_full_unstemmed The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title_short The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
title_sort effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking
work_keys_str_mv AT atkinsonj theeffectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT pimmsmithe theeffectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT evansc theeffectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT braddicko theeffectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT atkinsonj effectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT pimmsmithe effectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT evansc effectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking
AT braddicko effectsofscreensizeandeccentricityonacuityestimatesininfantsusingpreferentiallooking