Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials

Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials

<p><strong>Background</strong><br/>Selective reporting of outcomes in clinical trials is a serious problem. We aimed to investigate the influence of the peer review process within biomedical journals on reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses within reports o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hopewell, S, Witt, C, Linde, K, Icke, K, Adedire, O, Kirtley, S, Altman, D
Format:	Journal article
Published:	BioMed Central 2018

Similar Items

Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
by: Sally Hopewell, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2013)

Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review
by: Chris J. Selman, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Statistics notes: Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a scoping review
by: Chris J. Selman, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals : retrospective before and after study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2014)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2008)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2001)

A comparison of statistical approaches for analysing missing longitudinal patient reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials
by: Rombach, I, et al.
Published: (2017)

Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study
by: Jane Candlish, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2010)

Presentation of continuous outcomes in randomised trials: an observational study.
by: Schriger, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
by: Chan, A, et al.
Published: (2003)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
by: Chan, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Randomisation in the SYMPHONY trial.
by: Altman, D
Published: (2000)

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2010)

Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.
by: Cook, J, et al.
Published: (2015)

Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reporting power calculations is important
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

Peer support in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial in primary care with parallel economic and qualitative analyses: pilot study and protocol
by: O'Kelly Fergus, et al.
Published: (2007-07-01)

Reporting on covariate adjustment in randomised controlled trials before and after revision of the 2001 CONSORT statement: a literature review.
by: Yu, L, et al.
Published: (2010)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Matthias Briel, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials
by: Suzie Cro, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Comprehensive review of statistical methods for analysing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used as primary outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published by the UK’s Health Technology Assessment (HTA) journal (1997–2020)
by: Stephen J Walters, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2010)

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2010)

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2010)

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.
by: Bland, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Speich, B, et al.
Published: (2020)

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Meta-analyses and overviews of randomised trials.
by: Richards, S
Published: (1995)

Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
by: Rothwell, P, et al.
Published: (1997)

Power estimations for non-primary outcomes in randomised clinical trials
by: Per Winkel, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Improving the reporting of randomised trials: The CONSORT Statement andbeyond
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2012)