Possession and damages for tortious interferences with chattels
The common law has long maintained that, where a defendant has tortiously interfered with a chattel that was in the claimant’s possession at the time of the wrong, the claimant is, in general, to be presumed to be the ‘absolute and complete owner’ of the chattel. It is argued in this article that th...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicat: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|