Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete

We study the profitability of bundling by an upstream firm that licenses technologies to downstream competitors, and that faces competition for one of its technologies. In an otherwise standard ``Chicago-style" model, the existence of downstream competition can make inefficient bundling profita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Cornière, A, Taylor, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American Economics Association 2023
_version_ 1797112961074987008
author de Cornière, A
Taylor, G
author_facet de Cornière, A
Taylor, G
author_sort de Cornière, A
collection OXFORD
description We study the profitability of bundling by an upstream firm that licenses technologies to downstream competitors, and that faces competition for one of its technologies. In an otherwise standard ``Chicago-style" model, the existence of downstream competition can make inefficient bundling profitable. Forcing downstream firms to use an inefficient technology reassures each one that it will face weak competition. This allows the upstream firm to extract more profit through its monopolized technology. A similar logic can make it profitable to degrade interoperability with rival technologies, even without foreclosing competition. Bundling is most profitable when downstream competition is intense and technologies complementary.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:10:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:dd87637e-51c1-4320-985d-5971e35ef313
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T03:55:27Z
publishDate 2023
publisher American Economics Association
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:dd87637e-51c1-4320-985d-5971e35ef3132024-03-11T16:28:27ZAnticompetitive bundling when buyers compete Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:dd87637e-51c1-4320-985d-5971e35ef313EnglishSymplectic ElementsAmerican Economics Association2023de Cornière, ATaylor, GWe study the profitability of bundling by an upstream firm that licenses technologies to downstream competitors, and that faces competition for one of its technologies. In an otherwise standard ``Chicago-style" model, the existence of downstream competition can make inefficient bundling profitable. Forcing downstream firms to use an inefficient technology reassures each one that it will face weak competition. This allows the upstream firm to extract more profit through its monopolized technology. A similar logic can make it profitable to degrade interoperability with rival technologies, even without foreclosing competition. Bundling is most profitable when downstream competition is intense and technologies complementary.
spellingShingle de Cornière, A
Taylor, G
Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title_full Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title_fullStr Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title_full_unstemmed Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title_short Anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
title_sort anticompetitive bundling when buyers compete
work_keys_str_mv AT decornierea anticompetitivebundlingwhenbuyerscompete
AT taylorg anticompetitivebundlingwhenbuyerscompete