Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
The 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment...
প্রধান লেখক: | , |
---|---|
বিন্যাস: | Journal article |
প্রকাশিত: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
_version_ | 1826300470620061696 |
---|---|
author | Warriner, DR O’Sullivan, JW |
author_facet | Warriner, DR O’Sullivan, JW |
author_sort | Warriner, DR |
collection | OXFORD |
description | The 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of stable angina. It showed no significant difference in exercise tolerance between patients treated with a sham procedure (placebo) and with PCI. Further, patients who underwent PCI had no improvements in other exercise outcomes, nor with any patient-reported endpoints. The results from the ORBITA trial have important implications for clinical practice and research. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:17:40Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b58186593 |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:17:40Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b581865932022-03-27T09:27:26ZHas too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b58186593Symplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2018Warriner, DRO’Sullivan, JWThe 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of stable angina. It showed no significant difference in exercise tolerance between patients treated with a sham procedure (placebo) and with PCI. Further, patients who underwent PCI had no improvements in other exercise outcomes, nor with any patient-reported endpoints. The results from the ORBITA trial have important implications for clinical practice and research. |
spellingShingle | Warriner, DR O’Sullivan, JW Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title | Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title_full | Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title_fullStr | Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title_full_unstemmed | Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title_short | Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA? |
title_sort | has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness orbita |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warrinerdr hastoomuchcardiologybeensentintotheappropriatenessorbita AT osullivanjw hastoomuchcardiologybeensentintotheappropriatenessorbita |