Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?

The 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Warriner, DR, O’Sullivan, JW
বিন্যাস: Journal article
প্রকাশিত: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
_version_ 1826300470620061696
author Warriner, DR
O’Sullivan, JW
author_facet Warriner, DR
O’Sullivan, JW
author_sort Warriner, DR
collection OXFORD
description The 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of stable angina. It showed no significant difference in exercise tolerance between patients treated with a sham procedure (placebo) and with PCI. Further, patients who underwent PCI had no improvements in other exercise outcomes, nor with any patient-reported endpoints. The results from the ORBITA trial have important implications for clinical practice and research.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:17:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b58186593
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:17:40Z
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b581865932022-03-27T09:27:26ZHas too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ddc64c36-bee2-4413-b05f-864b58186593Symplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2018Warriner, DRO’Sullivan, JWThe 2017, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trial by Al-Lamee et al1 was the first double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial to investigate the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of stable angina. It showed no significant difference in exercise tolerance between patients treated with a sham procedure (placebo) and with PCI. Further, patients who underwent PCI had no improvements in other exercise outcomes, nor with any patient-reported endpoints. The results from the ORBITA trial have important implications for clinical practice and research.
spellingShingle Warriner, DR
O’Sullivan, JW
Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title_full Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title_fullStr Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title_full_unstemmed Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title_short Has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness ORBITA?
title_sort has too much cardiology been sent into the appropriateness orbita
work_keys_str_mv AT warrinerdr hastoomuchcardiologybeensentintotheappropriatenessorbita
AT osullivanjw hastoomuchcardiologybeensentintotheappropriatenessorbita