“Evaluate what I was taught, not what you expected me to know”: evaluating students’ arguments based on science teachers’ adaptations to Toulmin’s argument pattern
The paper examines how science teachers’ instructional adaptations to Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP), made during the first time the framework is introduced to students as a learning heuristic for structuring their arguments, could contribute to the way the quality of st...
Main Authors: | Lazarou, D, Erduran, S |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?
by: Tomáš Kollárik
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education
by: Erduran, S
Published: (2018) -
Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”
by: Ben Hamby
Published: (2012-03-01) -
The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument
by: Andrew Pineau
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability
by: James B. Freeman
Published: (2008-02-01)