Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers

Water vapour in the atmosphere is the source of a major climate feedback mechanism and potential increases in the availability of water vapour could have important consequences for mean and extreme precipitation. Future precipitation changes further depend on how the hydrological cycle responds to d...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Hodnebrog, Ø, Myhre, G, Samset, B, Alterskjær, K, Andrews, T, Boucher, O, Faluvegi, G, Fläschner, D, Forster, P, Kasoar, M, Kirkevåg, A, Lamarque, J-F, Olivie, D, Richardson, T, Shawki, D, Shindell, D, Shine, KP, Stier, P, Takemura, T, Voulgarikis, A, Watson-Parris, D
Materiálatiipa: Journal article
Almmustuhtton: Copernicus Publications 2019
_version_ 1826307491935289344
author Hodnebrog, Ø
Myhre, G
Samset, B
Alterskjær, K
Andrews, T
Boucher, O
Faluvegi, G
Fläschner, D
Forster, P
Kasoar, M
Kirkevåg, A
Lamarque, J-F
Olivie, D
Richardson, T
Shawki, D
Shindell, D
Shine, KP
Stier, P
Takemura, T
Voulgarikis, A
Watson-Parris, D
author_facet Hodnebrog, Ø
Myhre, G
Samset, B
Alterskjær, K
Andrews, T
Boucher, O
Faluvegi, G
Fläschner, D
Forster, P
Kasoar, M
Kirkevåg, A
Lamarque, J-F
Olivie, D
Richardson, T
Shawki, D
Shindell, D
Shine, KP
Stier, P
Takemura, T
Voulgarikis, A
Watson-Parris, D
author_sort Hodnebrog, Ø
collection OXFORD
description Water vapour in the atmosphere is the source of a major climate feedback mechanism and potential increases in the availability of water vapour could have important consequences for mean and extreme precipitation. Future precipitation changes further depend on how the hydrological cycle responds to different drivers of climate change, such as greenhouse gases and aerosols. Currently, neither the total anthropogenic influence on the hydrological cycle nor that from individual drivers is constrained sufficiently to make solid projections. We investigate how integrated water vapour (IWV) responds to different drivers of climate change. Results from 11 global climate models have been used, based on simulations where CO2, methane, solar irradiance, black carbon (BC), and sulfate have been perturbed separately. While the global-mean IWV is usually assumed to increase by ∼7 % per kelvin of surface temperature change, we find that the feedback response of IWV differs somewhat between drivers. Fast responses, which include the initial radiative effect and rapid adjustments to an external forcing, amplify these differences. The resulting net changes in IWV range from 6.4±0.9 % K−1 for sulfate to 9.8±2 % K−1 for BC. We further calculate the relationship between global changes in IWV and precipitation, which can be characterized by quantifying changes in atmospheric water vapour lifetime. Global climate models simulate a substantial increase in the lifetime, from 8.2±0.5 to 9.9±0.7 d between 1986–2005 and 2081–2100 under a high-emission scenario, and we discuss to what extent the water vapour lifetime provides additional information compared to analysis of IWV and precipitation separately. We conclude that water vapour lifetime changes are an important indicator of changes in precipitation patterns and that BC is particularly efficient in prolonging the mean time, and therefore likely the distance, between evaporation and precipitation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:47Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:de048b6a-931e-48dc-bc09-e3a92020f06c
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:47Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:de048b6a-931e-48dc-bc09-e3a92020f06c2022-03-29T17:19:46ZWater vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate driversJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:de048b6a-931e-48dc-bc09-e3a92020f06cSymplectic Elements at OxfordCopernicus Publications2019Hodnebrog, ØMyhre, GSamset, BAlterskjær, KAndrews, TBoucher, OFaluvegi, GFläschner, DForster, PKasoar, MKirkevåg, ALamarque, J-FOlivie, DRichardson, TShawki, DShindell, DShine, KPStier, PTakemura, TVoulgarikis, AWatson-Parris, DWater vapour in the atmosphere is the source of a major climate feedback mechanism and potential increases in the availability of water vapour could have important consequences for mean and extreme precipitation. Future precipitation changes further depend on how the hydrological cycle responds to different drivers of climate change, such as greenhouse gases and aerosols. Currently, neither the total anthropogenic influence on the hydrological cycle nor that from individual drivers is constrained sufficiently to make solid projections. We investigate how integrated water vapour (IWV) responds to different drivers of climate change. Results from 11 global climate models have been used, based on simulations where CO2, methane, solar irradiance, black carbon (BC), and sulfate have been perturbed separately. While the global-mean IWV is usually assumed to increase by ∼7 % per kelvin of surface temperature change, we find that the feedback response of IWV differs somewhat between drivers. Fast responses, which include the initial radiative effect and rapid adjustments to an external forcing, amplify these differences. The resulting net changes in IWV range from 6.4±0.9 % K−1 for sulfate to 9.8±2 % K−1 for BC. We further calculate the relationship between global changes in IWV and precipitation, which can be characterized by quantifying changes in atmospheric water vapour lifetime. Global climate models simulate a substantial increase in the lifetime, from 8.2±0.5 to 9.9±0.7 d between 1986–2005 and 2081–2100 under a high-emission scenario, and we discuss to what extent the water vapour lifetime provides additional information compared to analysis of IWV and precipitation separately. We conclude that water vapour lifetime changes are an important indicator of changes in precipitation patterns and that BC is particularly efficient in prolonging the mean time, and therefore likely the distance, between evaporation and precipitation.
spellingShingle Hodnebrog, Ø
Myhre, G
Samset, B
Alterskjær, K
Andrews, T
Boucher, O
Faluvegi, G
Fläschner, D
Forster, P
Kasoar, M
Kirkevåg, A
Lamarque, J-F
Olivie, D
Richardson, T
Shawki, D
Shindell, D
Shine, KP
Stier, P
Takemura, T
Voulgarikis, A
Watson-Parris, D
Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title_full Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title_fullStr Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title_full_unstemmed Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title_short Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
title_sort water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
work_keys_str_mv AT hodnebrogø watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT myhreg watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT samsetb watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT alterskjærk watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT andrewst watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT bouchero watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT faluvegig watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT flaschnerd watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT forsterp watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT kasoarm watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT kirkevaga watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT lamarquejf watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT olivied watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT richardsont watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT shawkid watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT shindelld watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT shinekp watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT stierp watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT takemurat watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT voulgarikisa watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers
AT watsonparrisd watervapouradjustmentsandresponsesdifferbetweenclimatedrivers