Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers

Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers

Show other versions (1)

Water vapour in the atmosphere is the source of a major climate feedback mechanism and potential increases in the availability of water vapour could have important consequences for mean and extreme precipitation. Future precipitation changes further depend on how the hydrological cycle responds to d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hodnebrog, Ø, Myhre, G, Samset, B, Alterskjær, K, Andrews, T, Boucher, O, Faluvegi, G, Fläschner, D, Forster, P, Kasoar, M, Kirkevåg, A, Lamarque, J-F, Olivie, D, Richardson, T, Shawki, D, Shindell, D, Shine, KP, Stier, P, Takemura, T, Voulgarikis, A, Watson-Parris, D
Format:	Journal article
Published:	Copernicus Publications 2019

Similar Items

Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
by: Hodnebrog, O, et al.
Published: (2019)

Increased water vapour lifetime due to global warming
by: Hodnebrog, Ø, et al.
Published: (2019)

Quantifying the importance of rapid adjustments for global precipitation changes
by: Myhre, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Understanding rapid adjustments to diverse forcing agents
by: Smith, C, et al.
Published: (2018)

Efficacy of climate forcings in PDRMIP models
by: Richardson, T, et al.
Published: (2019)

The Southern Hemisphere midlatitude circulation response to rapid adjustments and sea surface temperature driven feedbacks
by: Wood, T, et al.
Published: (2020)

Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon
by: Boucher, O, et al.
Published: (2016)

Assessing California wintertime precipitation responses to various climate drivers
by: Allen, RJ, et al.
Published: (2020)

Cloudy-sky contributions to the direct aerosol effect
by: Myhre, G, et al.
Published: (2020)

The temperature response to stratospheric water vapour changes
by: Maycock, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III
by: Sand, M, et al.
Published: (2021)

Laser ablation with copper vapour lasers
by: Kapitan, D
Published: (1999)

Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations
by: Schulz, M, et al.
Published: (2006)

Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations
by: Schulz, M, et al.
Published: (2006)

Vapour-diffusion assisted growth of oriented alpha-cobalt hydroxide thin films
by: Du, Y, et al.
Published: (2010)

Aniline vapour /
Published: (1968)

Rapid saturation of cloud water adjustments to shipping emissions
by: Manshausen, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

Rapid saturation of cloud water adjustments to shipping emissions
by: Manshausen, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation
by: Sand, M, et al.
Published: (2017)

On the contribution of fast and slow responses to precipitation changes caused by aerosol perturbations
by: Stier, P, et al.
Published: (2021)

Chemical vapour deposition
by: Sun, Luzhao, et al.
Published: (2021)

Vapour vacuum pumps
by: 8096 British Standards Institution

Carbon disulphide vapour/
Published: (1974)

Hydrogen cyanide vapour/
Published: (1973)

Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study
by: Stier, P, et al.
Published: (2013)

Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty
by: Samset, B, et al.
Published: (2013)

Aerosol forcing masks and delays the formation of the North-Atlantic warming hole by three decades
by: Dagan, G, et al.
Published: (2020)

Contrasting response of precipitation to aerosol perturbation in the tropics and extratropics explained by energy budget considerations
by: Dagan, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Analysis of the atmospheric water budget for elucidating the spatial scale of precipitation changes under climate change
by: Dagan, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

An energetic view on the geographical dependence of the fast aerosol radiative effects on precipitation
by: Dagan, G, et al.
Published: (2021)

Cloud adjustments dominate the overall negative aerosol radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols in UKESM1 climate model simulations over the south-eastern Atlantic
by: Che, H, et al.
Published: (2021)

Vapour sensing of explosive materials
by: Lefferts, M, et al.
Published: (2015)

Unconfined vapour cloud exploions/
by: 228566 Gugan, Keith
Published: (1978)

Growth of crystals from the vapour /
by: 230349 Faktor, M. M., et al.
Published: (1974)

Structure of vapour deposited adenine on a nanostructured perovskite surface studied by STM.
by: Fraser, D, et al.
Published: (2006)

High-throughput physical vapour deposition flexible thermoelectric generators
by: Morgan, K, et al.
Published: (2019)

Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations
by: Samset, B, et al.
Published: (2014)

Water vapour effects of cyclic oxidation on Fe-Cr alloys
by: N.K. Othman,, et al.
Published: (2010)

Decomposing effective radiative forcing due to aerosol cloud interactions by global cloud regimes
by: Langton, T, et al.
Published: (2021)

Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study
by: Stier, P, et al.
Published: (2013)