The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.

In a recent paper for the Journal of African History, A.G. Hopkins writes that economists have spent the last decade writing a “new” economic history of Africa that has escaped the notice of historians. He labels the “ethnolinguistic fractionalization” and “reversal of fortune” theses as this litera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fenske, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2010
_version_ 1826300571742633984
author Fenske, J
author_facet Fenske, J
author_sort Fenske, J
collection OXFORD
description In a recent paper for the Journal of African History, A.G. Hopkins writes that economists have spent the last decade writing a “new” economic history of Africa that has escaped the notice of historians. He labels the “ethnolinguistic fractionalization” and “reversal of fortune” theses as this literature's key insights. In this paper, I shall argue that the most valuable contributions to the new economic history of Africa are not distinguished by their broad theories, but by their careful focus on causal inference. I shall survey recent contributions to this literature, compare them with the “old” economic history of Africa, and revise Hopkins's advice to historians accordingly.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:19:12Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:de4a2357-7213-4fcf-9764-ddd93895cece
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:19:12Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:de4a2357-7213-4fcf-9764-ddd93895cece2022-03-27T09:31:09ZThe causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:de4a2357-7213-4fcf-9764-ddd93895ceceEnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsRoutledge2010Fenske, JIn a recent paper for the Journal of African History, A.G. Hopkins writes that economists have spent the last decade writing a “new” economic history of Africa that has escaped the notice of historians. He labels the “ethnolinguistic fractionalization” and “reversal of fortune” theses as this literature's key insights. In this paper, I shall argue that the most valuable contributions to the new economic history of Africa are not distinguished by their broad theories, but by their careful focus on causal inference. I shall survey recent contributions to this literature, compare them with the “old” economic history of Africa, and revise Hopkins's advice to historians accordingly.
spellingShingle Fenske, J
The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title_full The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title_fullStr The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title_full_unstemmed The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title_short The causal history of Africa: A response to Hopkins.
title_sort causal history of africa a response to hopkins
work_keys_str_mv AT fenskej thecausalhistoryofafricaaresponsetohopkins
AT fenskej causalhistoryofafricaaresponsetohopkins