Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net

Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ES...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O'Sullivan, J, Heneghan, C, Perera, R, Oke, J, Aronson, J, Shine, B, Goldacre, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018
_version_ 1797099214132477952
author O'Sullivan, J
Heneghan, C
Perera, R
Oke, J
Aronson, J
Shine, B
Goldacre, B
author_facet O'Sullivan, J
Heneghan, C
Perera, R
Oke, J
Aronson, J
Shine, B
Goldacre, B
author_sort O'Sullivan, J
collection OXFORD
description Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We estimated the adjusted average proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that yielded abnormal results from each practice, after adjusting for differences in practice populations. These proportions were plotted against the total CRP and ESR requests per practice. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. We analysed 143,745 CRP and 30,758 ESR requests from 69 practices. Twelve (17%) and 7 (10%) practices were more than 3 standard deviations below the mean for CRP and ESR testing respectively. Two practices (3%) were below the 99.8% limit for both CRP and ESR ordering. Variation in the proportion of tests with an abnormal result shows promise for auditing variation in care.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:20:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:debc5825-4133-4540-9dd2-4931dbcd0e9e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:20:32Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:debc5825-4133-4540-9dd2-4931dbcd0e9e2022-03-27T09:34:22ZVariation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.netJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:debc5825-4133-4540-9dd2-4931dbcd0e9eEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordNature Publishing Group2018O'Sullivan, JHeneghan, CPerera, ROke, JAronson, JShine, BGoldacre, BEfforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We estimated the adjusted average proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that yielded abnormal results from each practice, after adjusting for differences in practice populations. These proportions were plotted against the total CRP and ESR requests per practice. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. We analysed 143,745 CRP and 30,758 ESR requests from 69 practices. Twelve (17%) and 7 (10%) practices were more than 3 standard deviations below the mean for CRP and ESR testing respectively. Two practices (3%) were below the 99.8% limit for both CRP and ESR ordering. Variation in the proportion of tests with an abnormal result shows promise for auditing variation in care.
spellingShingle O'Sullivan, J
Heneghan, C
Perera, R
Oke, J
Aronson, J
Shine, B
Goldacre, B
Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_full Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_fullStr Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_full_unstemmed Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_short Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_sort variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes a preliminary metric for openpathology net
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivanj variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT heneghanc variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT pererar variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT okej variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT aronsonj variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT shineb variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT goldacreb variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet