Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine

This article considers why and how self-knowledge is important to communication about risk and behaviour change by arguing for four claims. First, it is doubtful that genetic knowledge should properly be called ‘self-knowledge’ when its ordinary effects on self-motivation and behaviour change seem s...

Cur síos iomlán

Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoir: Hordern, J
Formáid: Journal article
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: Routledge 2017
_version_ 1826300710755500032
author Hordern, J
author_facet Hordern, J
author_sort Hordern, J
collection OXFORD
description This article considers why and how self-knowledge is important to communication about risk and behaviour change by arguing for four claims. First, it is doubtful that genetic knowledge should properly be called ‘self-knowledge’ when its ordinary effects on self-motivation and behaviour change seem so slight. Second, temptations towards a reductionist, fatalist, construal of persons’ futures through a ‘molecular optic’ should be resisted. Third, any plausible effort to change people’s behaviour must engage with cultural self-knowledge, values and beliefs, catalysed by the communication of genetic risk. For example, while a Judaeo-Christian notion of self-knowledge is distinctively theological, people’s self-knowledge is plural in its insight and sources. Fourth, self-knowledge is found in compassionate, if tense, communion which yields freedom from determinism even amidst suffering. Stratified medicine thus offers a newly precise kind of humanising health care through societal solidarity with the riskiest. However, stratification may also mean that molecularly unstratified, ‘B’ patients’ experience involves accentuated suffering and disappointment, a concern requiring further research.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:19Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:df03f581-db0e-49cd-9d50-a9d87d35f02f
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:19Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:df03f581-db0e-49cd-9d50-a9d87d35f02f2022-03-27T09:36:11ZSelf-knowledge and risk in stratified medicineJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:df03f581-db0e-49cd-9d50-a9d87d35f02fSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2017Hordern, JThis article considers why and how self-knowledge is important to communication about risk and behaviour change by arguing for four claims. First, it is doubtful that genetic knowledge should properly be called ‘self-knowledge’ when its ordinary effects on self-motivation and behaviour change seem so slight. Second, temptations towards a reductionist, fatalist, construal of persons’ futures through a ‘molecular optic’ should be resisted. Third, any plausible effort to change people’s behaviour must engage with cultural self-knowledge, values and beliefs, catalysed by the communication of genetic risk. For example, while a Judaeo-Christian notion of self-knowledge is distinctively theological, people’s self-knowledge is plural in its insight and sources. Fourth, self-knowledge is found in compassionate, if tense, communion which yields freedom from determinism even amidst suffering. Stratified medicine thus offers a newly precise kind of humanising health care through societal solidarity with the riskiest. However, stratification may also mean that molecularly unstratified, ‘B’ patients’ experience involves accentuated suffering and disappointment, a concern requiring further research.
spellingShingle Hordern, J
Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title_full Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title_fullStr Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title_full_unstemmed Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title_short Self-knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
title_sort self knowledge and risk in stratified medicine
work_keys_str_mv AT hordernj selfknowledgeandriskinstratifiedmedicine