Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971

<p>This thesis is about British disengagement from the southern coast of the Persian Gulf. Britain never had colonies in the region, but had held significant imperial sway over nine Protected States since the nineteenth century. The informal empire remained intact until the Labour government (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sato, S
Other Authors: Shlaim, A
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
_version_ 1826300716135743488
author Sato, S
author2 Shlaim, A
author_facet Shlaim, A
Sato, S
author_sort Sato, S
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis is about British disengagement from the southern coast of the Persian Gulf. Britain never had colonies in the region, but had held significant imperial sway over nine Protected States since the nineteenth century. The informal empire remained intact until the Labour government (1964-70) announced its intention to leave, in consequence of which Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates became independent in 1971.</p><p>This thesis attempts three things. First, it draws on extensive archival research to provide the fullest possible account of British withdrawal: why it had to leave, how it did and what followed. The Gulf rulers wanted to maintain British protection for their own security, but Britain decided nonetheless on military retreat, because it needed to placate the domestic constituency in order to push forward the reversal of social reforms due to economic retrenchment. The Gulf rulers responded quickly, yet unsuccessfully, in deciding how many states would be formed as they achieve independence. It was only after the Gulf rulers and the British diplomats on the ground made late and mutually acceptable compromises about coming together that the nine Protected States became three new independent sovereign states. In the end, Britain was able to leave the Gulf peacefully, and the new states retained close relations with Britain.</p><p>Second, the study of an informal empire illuminates the enduring collaborative relationship between Britain and the Gulf rulers, characterised by the nominal sovereignty given to the Protected States. This relationship not only helped Britain maintain its imperial sway at little cost, but also made possible a peaceful withdrawal and the orderly emergence of the new states.</p><p>Third, this informal empire characterised by collaboration and nominal sovereignty laid the structural foundations for the later international society in the region – a point more generally telling for the study of international relations.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:23Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:df0aec03-0426-410e-be60-e5e702647df3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:23Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:df0aec03-0426-410e-be60-e5e702647df32022-03-27T09:36:26ZBritain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:df0aec03-0426-410e-be60-e5e702647df3International,imperial and global historyHistory of other areasInternational studiesHistory of Britain and EuropeEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2011Sato, SShlaim, A<p>This thesis is about British disengagement from the southern coast of the Persian Gulf. Britain never had colonies in the region, but had held significant imperial sway over nine Protected States since the nineteenth century. The informal empire remained intact until the Labour government (1964-70) announced its intention to leave, in consequence of which Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates became independent in 1971.</p><p>This thesis attempts three things. First, it draws on extensive archival research to provide the fullest possible account of British withdrawal: why it had to leave, how it did and what followed. The Gulf rulers wanted to maintain British protection for their own security, but Britain decided nonetheless on military retreat, because it needed to placate the domestic constituency in order to push forward the reversal of social reforms due to economic retrenchment. The Gulf rulers responded quickly, yet unsuccessfully, in deciding how many states would be formed as they achieve independence. It was only after the Gulf rulers and the British diplomats on the ground made late and mutually acceptable compromises about coming together that the nine Protected States became three new independent sovereign states. In the end, Britain was able to leave the Gulf peacefully, and the new states retained close relations with Britain.</p><p>Second, the study of an informal empire illuminates the enduring collaborative relationship between Britain and the Gulf rulers, characterised by the nominal sovereignty given to the Protected States. This relationship not only helped Britain maintain its imperial sway at little cost, but also made possible a peaceful withdrawal and the orderly emergence of the new states.</p><p>Third, this informal empire characterised by collaboration and nominal sovereignty laid the structural foundations for the later international society in the region – a point more generally telling for the study of international relations.</p>
spellingShingle International,imperial and global history
History of other areas
International studies
History of Britain and Europe
Sato, S
Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title_full Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title_fullStr Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title_full_unstemmed Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title_short Britain's withdrawal from the Persian Gulf, 1964-1971
title_sort britain s withdrawal from the persian gulf 1964 1971
topic International,imperial and global history
History of other areas
International studies
History of Britain and Europe
work_keys_str_mv AT satos britainswithdrawalfromthepersiangulf19641971