De-centring the 'white gaze' of development

In its crudest form, development has traditionally been about dissecting the political, socio‐economic and cultural processes of black, brown and other subjects of colour in the so‐called global South and finding them regressive, particularly in comparison to the so‐called progressive global North....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pailey, RN
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
_version_ 1797099272709079040
author Pailey, RN
author_facet Pailey, RN
author_sort Pailey, RN
collection OXFORD
description In its crudest form, development has traditionally been about dissecting the political, socio‐economic and cultural processes of black, brown and other subjects of colour in the so‐called global South and finding them regressive, particularly in comparison to the so‐called progressive global North. However, in the midst of a 21st century, de‐colonial scholarly pivot, ‘opening up development’ fundamentally demands turning the colonial, ‘white gaze’ on its head. In particular, contemporary social media movements challenging white supremacy such as #BlackLivesMatter have gained prominence while non‐white development actors such as China have emerged as enticing alternatives. These phenomena have pried open development with both positive and negative results, intended and unintended consequences. This article seeks to put Critical Development Studies into fluid conversation with Critical Race Studies in an examination of how scholars, policy makers and practitioners have simultaneously succeeded and failed in subverting the ‘white gaze’ of development.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:df0d8716-6225-47ac-80f2-e6996a696581
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:25Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:df0d8716-6225-47ac-80f2-e6996a6965812022-03-27T09:36:32ZDe-centring the 'white gaze' of developmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:df0d8716-6225-47ac-80f2-e6996a696581EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2019Pailey, RNIn its crudest form, development has traditionally been about dissecting the political, socio‐economic and cultural processes of black, brown and other subjects of colour in the so‐called global South and finding them regressive, particularly in comparison to the so‐called progressive global North. However, in the midst of a 21st century, de‐colonial scholarly pivot, ‘opening up development’ fundamentally demands turning the colonial, ‘white gaze’ on its head. In particular, contemporary social media movements challenging white supremacy such as #BlackLivesMatter have gained prominence while non‐white development actors such as China have emerged as enticing alternatives. These phenomena have pried open development with both positive and negative results, intended and unintended consequences. This article seeks to put Critical Development Studies into fluid conversation with Critical Race Studies in an examination of how scholars, policy makers and practitioners have simultaneously succeeded and failed in subverting the ‘white gaze’ of development.
spellingShingle Pailey, RN
De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title_full De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title_fullStr De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title_full_unstemmed De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title_short De-centring the 'white gaze' of development
title_sort de centring the white gaze of development
work_keys_str_mv AT paileyrn decentringthewhitegazeofdevelopment