International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment

We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leahy, D, Neary, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing 1996
Subjects:
_version_ 1826300743202635776
author Leahy, D
Neary, J
author_facet Leahy, D
Neary, J
author_sort Leahy, D
collection OXFORD
description We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home export subsidy, R&D; subsidy and welfare are higher when government commitment is credible than in the dynamically consistent equilibrium without commitment. Commitment thus yields welfare gains (though they are small) but so does unanticipated reneging, whereas reneging which is anticipated by firms yields the lowest welfare of all.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:48Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:df2b5728-9307-4558-950b-27d127946ea4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:21:48Z
publishDate 1996
publisher Blackwell Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:df2b5728-9307-4558-950b-27d127946ea42022-03-27T09:37:34ZInternational R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:df2b5728-9307-4558-950b-27d127946ea4EconomicsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetBlackwell Publishing1996Leahy, DNeary, JWe examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home export subsidy, R&D; subsidy and welfare are higher when government commitment is credible than in the dynamically consistent equilibrium without commitment. Commitment thus yields welfare gains (though they are small) but so does unanticipated reneging, whereas reneging which is anticipated by firms yields the lowest welfare of all.
spellingShingle Economics
Leahy, D
Neary, J
International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title_full International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title_fullStr International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title_full_unstemmed International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title_short International R&D; rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
title_sort international r amp d rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment
topic Economics
work_keys_str_mv AT leahyd internationalrampdrivalryandindustrialstrategywithoutgovernmentcommitment
AT nearyj internationalrampdrivalryandindustrialstrategywithoutgovernmentcommitment