Combining endpoint and change data did not affect the summary standardised mean difference in pairwise and network meta‐analyses: An empirical study in depression
When studies use different scales to measure continuous outcomes, standardised mean differences (SMD) are required to meta‐analyse the data. However, outcomes are often reported as endpoint or change from baseline scores. Combining corresponding SMDs can be problematic and available guidance advises...
Auteurs principaux: | Ostinelli, EG, Efthimiou, O, Luo, Y, Miguel, C, Karyotaki, E, Cuijpers, P, Furukawa, TA, Salanti, G, Cipriani, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
Wiley
2024
|
Documents similaires
-
Dismantling, personalising and optimising internet cognitive–behavioural therapy for depression: a study protocol for individual participant data component network meta-analysis
par: Furukawa, T, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.
par: Nikolakopoulou, A, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Has the Time Come to Stop Using the “Standardised Mean Difference”?
par: Pim Cuijpers
Publié: (2021-09-01) -
Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: a network meta-analysis
par: Ciharova, M, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data
par: Furukawa, TA, et autres
Publié: (2021)