Combining endpoint and change data did not affect the summary standardised mean difference in pairwise and network meta‐analyses: An empirical study in depression
When studies use different scales to measure continuous outcomes, standardised mean differences (SMD) are required to meta‐analyse the data. However, outcomes are often reported as endpoint or change from baseline scores. Combining corresponding SMDs can be problematic and available guidance advises...
Những tác giả chính: | Ostinelli, EG, Efthimiou, O, Luo, Y, Miguel, C, Karyotaki, E, Cuijpers, P, Furukawa, TA, Salanti, G, Cipriani, A |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Journal article |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Wiley
2024
|
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
Dismantling, personalising and optimising internet cognitive–behavioural therapy for depression: a study protocol for individual participant data component network meta-analysis
Bằng: Furukawa, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018) -
Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.
Bằng: Nikolakopoulou, A, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018) -
Has the Time Come to Stop Using the “Standardised Mean Difference”?
Bằng: Pim Cuijpers
Được phát hành: (2021-09-01) -
Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: a network meta-analysis
Bằng: Ciharova, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021) -
Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data
Bằng: Furukawa, TA, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)