Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future
Based on an extensive synthesis of semi-structured interviews, media content analysis, and reviews, this article conducts a qualitative meta-analysis of more than 560 sources of evidence to identify 38 visions associated with seven different low-carbon innovations – automated mobility, electric vehi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
| _version_ | 1797099519686475776 |
|---|---|
| author | Sovacool, BK Bergman, N Hopkins, D Jenkins, KEH Hielscher, S Goldthau, A Brossman, B |
| author_facet | Sovacool, BK Bergman, N Hopkins, D Jenkins, KEH Hielscher, S Goldthau, A Brossman, B |
| author_sort | Sovacool, BK |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Based on an extensive synthesis of semi-structured interviews, media content analysis, and reviews, this article conducts a qualitative meta-analysis of more than 560 sources of evidence to identify 38 visions associated with seven different low-carbon innovations – automated mobility, electric vehicles, smart meters, nuclear power, shale gas, hydrogen, and the fossil fuel divestment movement – playing a key role in current deliberations about mobility or low-carbon energy supply and use. From this material, it analyzes such visions based on rhetorical features such as common problems and functions, storylines, discursive struggles, and rhetorical effectiveness. It also analyzes visions based on typologies or degrees of valence (utopian vs. dystopian), temporality (proximal vs. distant), and radicalism (incremental vs. transformative). The article is motivated by the premise that tackling climate change via low-carbon energy systems (and practices) is one of the most significant challenges of the twenty-first century, and that effective decarbonization will require not only new energy technologies, but also new ways of understanding language, visions, and discursive politics surrounding emerging innovations and transitions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:24:55Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e0369a73-0b7e-412a-84b4-6a6fa293acda |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:24:55Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e0369a73-0b7e-412a-84b4-6a6fa293acda2022-03-27T09:45:26ZImagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon futureJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e0369a73-0b7e-412a-84b4-6a6fa293acdaEnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2020Sovacool, BKBergman, NHopkins, DJenkins, KEHHielscher, SGoldthau, ABrossman, BBased on an extensive synthesis of semi-structured interviews, media content analysis, and reviews, this article conducts a qualitative meta-analysis of more than 560 sources of evidence to identify 38 visions associated with seven different low-carbon innovations – automated mobility, electric vehicles, smart meters, nuclear power, shale gas, hydrogen, and the fossil fuel divestment movement – playing a key role in current deliberations about mobility or low-carbon energy supply and use. From this material, it analyzes such visions based on rhetorical features such as common problems and functions, storylines, discursive struggles, and rhetorical effectiveness. It also analyzes visions based on typologies or degrees of valence (utopian vs. dystopian), temporality (proximal vs. distant), and radicalism (incremental vs. transformative). The article is motivated by the premise that tackling climate change via low-carbon energy systems (and practices) is one of the most significant challenges of the twenty-first century, and that effective decarbonization will require not only new energy technologies, but also new ways of understanding language, visions, and discursive politics surrounding emerging innovations and transitions. |
| spellingShingle | Sovacool, BK Bergman, N Hopkins, D Jenkins, KEH Hielscher, S Goldthau, A Brossman, B Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title | Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title_full | Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title_fullStr | Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title_full_unstemmed | Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title_short | Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future |
| title_sort | imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions valence temporality and radicalism in 38 visions of a low carbon future |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sovacoolbk imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT bergmann imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT hopkinsd imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT jenkinskeh imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT hielschers imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT goldthaua imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture AT brossmanb imaginingsustainableenergyandmobilitytransitionsvalencetemporalityandradicalismin38visionsofalowcarbonfuture |