Semantic plasticity and speech reports

Most meanings we express belong to large families of variant meanings, among which it would be implausible to suppose that some are much more apt for being expressed than others. This abundance of candidate meanings creates pressure to think that the proposition attributing any particular meaning to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorr, C, Hawthorne, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Duke University Press 2013
Subjects:
_version_ 1797099561523609600
author Dorr, C
Hawthorne, J
author_facet Dorr, C
Hawthorne, J
author_sort Dorr, C
collection OXFORD
description Most meanings we express belong to large families of variant meanings, among which it would be implausible to suppose that some are much more apt for being expressed than others. This abundance of candidate meanings creates pressure to think that the proposition attributing any particular meaning to an expression is modally plastic: its truth depends very sensitively on the exact microphysical state of the world. However, such plasticity seems to threaten ordinary counterfactuals whose consequents contain speech reports, since it is hard to see how we could reasonably be confident in a counterfactual whose consequent can be true only if a certain very finely tuned microphysical configuration obtains. This essay develops the foregoing puzzle and explores several possible solutions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:25:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e06bea4b-c8cb-44dc-9a07-ee8c3ca41448
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:25:32Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Duke University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e06bea4b-c8cb-44dc-9a07-ee8c3ca414482022-03-27T09:47:03ZSemantic plasticity and speech reportsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e06bea4b-c8cb-44dc-9a07-ee8c3ca41448PhilosophyEnglishFaculty of PhilosophyDuke University Press2013Dorr, CHawthorne, JMost meanings we express belong to large families of variant meanings, among which it would be implausible to suppose that some are much more apt for being expressed than others. This abundance of candidate meanings creates pressure to think that the proposition attributing any particular meaning to an expression is modally plastic: its truth depends very sensitively on the exact microphysical state of the world. However, such plasticity seems to threaten ordinary counterfactuals whose consequents contain speech reports, since it is hard to see how we could reasonably be confident in a counterfactual whose consequent can be true only if a certain very finely tuned microphysical configuration obtains. This essay develops the foregoing puzzle and explores several possible solutions.
spellingShingle Philosophy
Dorr, C
Hawthorne, J
Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title_full Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title_fullStr Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title_full_unstemmed Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title_short Semantic plasticity and speech reports
title_sort semantic plasticity and speech reports
topic Philosophy
work_keys_str_mv AT dorrc semanticplasticityandspeechreports
AT hawthornej semanticplasticityandspeechreports