Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages

It is one of the central arguments of the Varieties-of-Capitalism (VoC) literature that national institutions determine comparative advantage. While Liberal Market Economies (LMEs) are said to offer comparative institutional advantages to firms that specialize in high-tech sectors based on radical i...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Meelen, A, Herrmann, A, Faber, J
Materiálatiipa: Journal article
Almmustuhtton: Elsevier 2017
_version_ 1826301027455860736
author Meelen, A
Herrmann, A
Faber, J
author_facet Meelen, A
Herrmann, A
Faber, J
author_sort Meelen, A
collection OXFORD
description It is one of the central arguments of the Varieties-of-Capitalism (VoC) literature that national institutions determine comparative advantage. While Liberal Market Economies (LMEs) are said to offer comparative institutional advantages to firms that specialize in high-tech sectors based on radical innovation, Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs) offer advantages to firms specializing in medium-high-tech sectors characterized by incremental innovation. Several studies have tested these claims and arrived at contradictory results about specialization in line with institutional advantages. We argue that undifferentiated conceptualizations of the notion of specialization contribute to these inconclusive results. Based on the insights of the innovation literature on comparative advantage, we therefore disentangle the concepts of 1) economic specialization, 2) technological specialization, and 3) innovative specialization. Our analyses of panel data on exports and patents show that the VoC theory is rather weak in explaining patterns of economic specialization but can account for technological specialization. Furthermore, the VoC literature can hardly explain patterns of innovative specialization.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:26:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e09f1c3c-8af1-41e8-9162-a444e044ce93
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:26:08Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e09f1c3c-8af1-41e8-9162-a444e044ce932022-03-27T09:48:34ZDisentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantagesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e09f1c3c-8af1-41e8-9162-a444e044ce93Symplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2017Meelen, AHerrmann, AFaber, JIt is one of the central arguments of the Varieties-of-Capitalism (VoC) literature that national institutions determine comparative advantage. While Liberal Market Economies (LMEs) are said to offer comparative institutional advantages to firms that specialize in high-tech sectors based on radical innovation, Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs) offer advantages to firms specializing in medium-high-tech sectors characterized by incremental innovation. Several studies have tested these claims and arrived at contradictory results about specialization in line with institutional advantages. We argue that undifferentiated conceptualizations of the notion of specialization contribute to these inconclusive results. Based on the insights of the innovation literature on comparative advantage, we therefore disentangle the concepts of 1) economic specialization, 2) technological specialization, and 3) innovative specialization. Our analyses of panel data on exports and patents show that the VoC theory is rather weak in explaining patterns of economic specialization but can account for technological specialization. Furthermore, the VoC literature can hardly explain patterns of innovative specialization.
spellingShingle Meelen, A
Herrmann, A
Faber, J
Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title_full Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title_fullStr Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title_short Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
title_sort disentangling patterns of economic technological and innovative specialization of western economies an assessment of the varieties of capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages
work_keys_str_mv AT meelena disentanglingpatternsofeconomictechnologicalandinnovativespecializationofwesterneconomiesanassessmentofthevarietiesofcapitalismtheoryoncomparativeinstitutionaladvantages
AT herrmanna disentanglingpatternsofeconomictechnologicalandinnovativespecializationofwesterneconomiesanassessmentofthevarietiesofcapitalismtheoryoncomparativeinstitutionaladvantages
AT faberj disentanglingpatternsofeconomictechnologicalandinnovativespecializationofwesterneconomiesanassessmentofthevarietiesofcapitalismtheoryoncomparativeinstitutionaladvantages