Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation

Friendships and other relationships are crucial to human fitness, yet such relationships often terminate acrimoniously. We explore the pattern of relationship conflict, and the processes of reconciliation that are used to repair them. In this sample, an individual fell out with one member of their e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dunbar, RIM, Machin, AJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Akadémiai Kiadó 2014
_version_ 1811139661969489920
author Dunbar, RIM
Machin, AJ
author_facet Dunbar, RIM
Machin, AJ
author_sort Dunbar, RIM
collection OXFORD
description Friendships and other relationships are crucial to human fitness, yet such relationships often terminate acrimoniously. We explore the pattern of relationship conflict, and the processes of reconciliation that are used to repair them. In this sample, an individual fell out with one member of their extended network, on average, every 7.2 months. Conflict with very close family is surprisingly high; nonetheless, most conflicts involve unrelated individuals (friends, colleagues), suggesting that kin relationships are relatively more buffered against the stresses that trigger conflict (reflecting the “kinship premium”). Around 40% of conflicts remain unreconciled after a year. There were striking sex differences in the intimacy of the relationships involved in breakdown, and the precipitating causes, as well as whom participants reported falling out with. These patterns may reflect women’s preference for fewer, more intimate (and correspondingly more fragile) relationships. The functional origins of this gender difference are not well understood.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:28:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e15dae18-edb1-4c6a-b2d8-b9c73db683f6
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:09:39Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e15dae18-edb1-4c6a-b2d8-b9c73db683f62024-06-11T09:40:32ZSex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e15dae18-edb1-4c6a-b2d8-b9c73db683f6EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordAkadémiai Kiadó2014Dunbar, RIMMachin, AJFriendships and other relationships are crucial to human fitness, yet such relationships often terminate acrimoniously. We explore the pattern of relationship conflict, and the processes of reconciliation that are used to repair them. In this sample, an individual fell out with one member of their extended network, on average, every 7.2 months. Conflict with very close family is surprisingly high; nonetheless, most conflicts involve unrelated individuals (friends, colleagues), suggesting that kin relationships are relatively more buffered against the stresses that trigger conflict (reflecting the “kinship premium”). Around 40% of conflicts remain unreconciled after a year. There were striking sex differences in the intimacy of the relationships involved in breakdown, and the precipitating causes, as well as whom participants reported falling out with. These patterns may reflect women’s preference for fewer, more intimate (and correspondingly more fragile) relationships. The functional origins of this gender difference are not well understood.
spellingShingle Dunbar, RIM
Machin, AJ
Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title_full Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title_fullStr Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title_short Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
title_sort sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation
work_keys_str_mv AT dunbarrim sexdifferencesinrelationshipconflictandreconciliation
AT machinaj sexdifferencesinrelationshipconflictandreconciliation