A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice

Non‐compliance in fisheries is a persistent challenge for the conservation and sustainable management of the oceans and has particularly acute impacts in small‐scale fisheries contexts. Small‐scale fisheries often suffer from chronic overexploitation, poor management, lack of enforcement and non‐com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oyanedel, R, Gelcich, S, Milner-Gulland, EJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
_version_ 1826301294249246720
author Oyanedel, R
Gelcich, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
author_facet Oyanedel, R
Gelcich, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
author_sort Oyanedel, R
collection OXFORD
description Non‐compliance in fisheries is a persistent challenge for the conservation and sustainable management of the oceans and has particularly acute impacts in small‐scale fisheries contexts. Small‐scale fisheries often suffer from chronic overexploitation, poor management, lack of enforcement and non‐compliance, but small‐scale fishers are highly dependent on the ocean as a source of employment and food. Improving our understanding of the determinants of non‐compliant behaviours in small‐scale fisheries can help develop strategies to prevent and reduce its consequences. Here, we review two main approaches for the study of non‐compliant behaviours and crimes more broadly, spanning criminology, economics and psychology. On the one hand, actor‐based approaches address the underlying motivations for people to comply or not with regulations. Opportunity‐based approaches, on the other hand, assume that non‐compliance is not distributed randomly across space and time and focuses on the role that the immediate environment plays in the performance of non‐compliant behaviours. We discuss potential applications of actor‐based and opportunity‐based approaches in guiding small‐scale fisheries non‐compliance research. Moreover, we provide guiding principles for integrating these approaches in a complementary way, highlighting opportunities and challenges for building a better non‐compliance research agenda for fisheries and beyond. Addressing non‐compliance is a common challenge for natural resource management in multiple ecosystems. Integrating these two perspectives has the potential to improve both research and practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:30:13Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e1ff7923-04ea-4897-a463-e50e1e6ae122
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:30:13Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e1ff7923-04ea-4897-a463-e50e1e6ae1222022-03-27T09:58:11ZA synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practiceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e1ff7923-04ea-4897-a463-e50e1e6ae122EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2020Oyanedel, RGelcich, SMilner-Gulland, EJNon‐compliance in fisheries is a persistent challenge for the conservation and sustainable management of the oceans and has particularly acute impacts in small‐scale fisheries contexts. Small‐scale fisheries often suffer from chronic overexploitation, poor management, lack of enforcement and non‐compliance, but small‐scale fishers are highly dependent on the ocean as a source of employment and food. Improving our understanding of the determinants of non‐compliant behaviours in small‐scale fisheries can help develop strategies to prevent and reduce its consequences. Here, we review two main approaches for the study of non‐compliant behaviours and crimes more broadly, spanning criminology, economics and psychology. On the one hand, actor‐based approaches address the underlying motivations for people to comply or not with regulations. Opportunity‐based approaches, on the other hand, assume that non‐compliance is not distributed randomly across space and time and focuses on the role that the immediate environment plays in the performance of non‐compliant behaviours. We discuss potential applications of actor‐based and opportunity‐based approaches in guiding small‐scale fisheries non‐compliance research. Moreover, we provide guiding principles for integrating these approaches in a complementary way, highlighting opportunities and challenges for building a better non‐compliance research agenda for fisheries and beyond. Addressing non‐compliance is a common challenge for natural resource management in multiple ecosystems. Integrating these two perspectives has the potential to improve both research and practice.
spellingShingle Oyanedel, R
Gelcich, S
Milner-Gulland, EJ
A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title_full A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title_fullStr A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title_full_unstemmed A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title_short A synthesis of (non‐)compliance theories with applications to small‐scale fisheries research and practice
title_sort synthesis of non compliance theories with applications to small scale fisheries research and practice
work_keys_str_mv AT oyanedelr asynthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice
AT gelcichs asynthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice
AT milnergullandej asynthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice
AT oyanedelr synthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice
AT gelcichs synthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice
AT milnergullandej synthesisofnoncompliancetheorieswithapplicationstosmallscalefisheriesresearchandpractice