Publication bias in systematic reviews.

Publication bias in systematic reviews.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Barbui, C, Cipriani, A
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2007

Similar Items

What is a systematic review?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2006)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
by: Dwan, K, et al.
Published: (2008)

Why it is important to include unpublished data in systematic reviews.
by: Trespidi, C, et al.
Published: (2011)

Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials.
by: Esposito, E, et al.
Published: (2009)

Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.
by: Purgato, M, et al.
Published: (2010)

Antipsychotic drugs and cerebrovascular events in elderly patients with dementia: a systematic review.
by: Mazzucco, S, et al.
Published: (2008)

"Wish bias" in antidepressant drug trials?
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2004)

Long-term treatment of depression with antidepressants: a systematic narrative review.
by: Furukawa, T, et al.
Published: (2007)

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2009)

[Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
by: Purgato, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased.
by: Senn, S
Published: (2000)

Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2014)

Are all antidepressants really the same? The case of fluoxetine: a systematic review.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2006)

Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials.
by: Koesters, M, et al.
Published: (2013)

Relationship between quality of reports of antidepressant randomized controlled trials and treatment estimates: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Efficacy of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in minor depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2011)

What is a Cochrane review?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Catalogue of bias: publication bias
by: Goldacre, B, et al.
Published: (2018)

Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re-examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2008)

Depressive disorder needs an evidence base commensurate with its public health importance.
by: Geddes, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

Attention bias in individuals with addictive disorders : systematic review protocol
by: Zhang, Melvyn, et al.
Published: (2019)

The usefulness and interpretation of systematic reviews
by: Smith, K, et al.
Published: (2016)

Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.
by: Boone, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Systematic review: Bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity
by: Boone, D, et al.
Published: (2011)

Publication bias and merit in ecology
by: Lortie, C, et al.
Published: (2007)

Cognitive biases in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant disorders : a systematic review
by: Zhang, Melvyn Weibin, et al.
Published: (2018)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of adults with major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Watanabe, N, et al.
Published: (2008)

Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression in comparison with other antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Nakagawa, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics.
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2003)

A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.
by: Mavridis, D, et al.
Published: (2013)

Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2018)

Publication bias in clinical research.
by: Easterbrook, P, et al.
Published: (1991)

Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity.
by: Elamin, M, et al.
Published: (2009)

A systematic review of attention biases in opioid, cannabis, stimulant use disorders
by: Fung, Daniel S. S., et al.
Published: (2018)

Artificial intelligence for mechanical ventilation: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and bias
by: Gallifant, J, et al.
Published: (2021)

Systematic bias in perceptions of product success
by: Walker, Gordon.
Published: (2009)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Effects of publication bias on conservation planning
by: Hickisch, R, et al.
Published: (2019)

A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies
by: Whiting, P, et al.
Published: (2013)