Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations
<strong>Background</strong> The majority of schistosomiasis control programmes focus on targeting school-aged children. Expanding the use of community-wide mass treatment to reach more adults is under consideration. However, it should be noted that this would require a further increase i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
| _version_ | 1797100000026558464 |
|---|---|
| author | Turner, H Truscott, J Bettis, A Farrell, S Deol, A Whitton, J Fleming, F Anderson, R |
| author_facet | Turner, H Truscott, J Bettis, A Farrell, S Deol, A Whitton, J Fleming, F Anderson, R |
| author_sort | Turner, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <strong>Background</strong> The majority of schistosomiasis control programmes focus on targeting school-aged children. Expanding the use of community-wide mass treatment to reach more adults is under consideration. However, it should be noted that this would require a further increase in programmatic resources, international aid, and commitment for the provision of praziquantel. Consequently, it is important to understand i) where a change of strategy would have the greatest benefit, and ii) how generalizable the conclusions of field trials and analytical studies based on mathematical models investigating the impact of community-wide mass treatment, are to a broad range of settings. <strong>Method</strong> In this paper, we employ a previously described deterministic fully age-structured schistosomiasis transmission model and evaluate the benefit of community-wide mass treatment both in terms of controlling morbidity and eliminating transmission for Schistosoma mansoni, across a wide range of epidemiological settings and programmatic scenarios. This included variation in the baseline relative worm pre-control burden in adults, the overall level of transmission in defined settings, choice of effectiveness metric (basing morbidity calculations on prevalence or intensity), the level of school enrolment and treatment compliance. <strong>Results</strong> Community-wide mass treatment was found to be more effective for controlling the transmission of schistosome parasites than using a school-based programme only targeting school-aged children. However, in the context of morbidity control, the potential benefit of switching to community-wide mass treatment was highly variable across the different scenarios analysed. In contrast, for areas where the goal is to eliminate transmission, the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment was more consistent. <strong>Conclusion</strong> Whether community-wide mass treatment is appropriate will depend on the local epidemiological setting (i.e. the relative pre-control burden in adults, and transmission intensity), and whether the goal is morbidity control or eliminating transmission. This has important implications regarding the generalisability of cost-effectiveness analyses of schistosomiasis interventions. Our results indicate that areas with poor school-enrolment/coverage could benefit more from community-wide treatment of praziquantel and should potentially be prioritised for any change in strategy. This work highlights the importance of not over-generalising conclusions and policy in this area, but of basing decisions on high quality epidemiological data and quantitative analyses of the impact of interventions in a range of settings. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:31:30Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e270a586-7c9d-41ba-a7e6-2e6fc5db3832 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:31:30Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e270a586-7c9d-41ba-a7e6-2e6fc5db38322022-03-27T10:01:15ZEvaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e270a586-7c9d-41ba-a7e6-2e6fc5db3832Symplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2017Turner, HTruscott, JBettis, AFarrell, SDeol, AWhitton, JFleming, FAnderson, R<strong>Background</strong> The majority of schistosomiasis control programmes focus on targeting school-aged children. Expanding the use of community-wide mass treatment to reach more adults is under consideration. However, it should be noted that this would require a further increase in programmatic resources, international aid, and commitment for the provision of praziquantel. Consequently, it is important to understand i) where a change of strategy would have the greatest benefit, and ii) how generalizable the conclusions of field trials and analytical studies based on mathematical models investigating the impact of community-wide mass treatment, are to a broad range of settings. <strong>Method</strong> In this paper, we employ a previously described deterministic fully age-structured schistosomiasis transmission model and evaluate the benefit of community-wide mass treatment both in terms of controlling morbidity and eliminating transmission for Schistosoma mansoni, across a wide range of epidemiological settings and programmatic scenarios. This included variation in the baseline relative worm pre-control burden in adults, the overall level of transmission in defined settings, choice of effectiveness metric (basing morbidity calculations on prevalence or intensity), the level of school enrolment and treatment compliance. <strong>Results</strong> Community-wide mass treatment was found to be more effective for controlling the transmission of schistosome parasites than using a school-based programme only targeting school-aged children. However, in the context of morbidity control, the potential benefit of switching to community-wide mass treatment was highly variable across the different scenarios analysed. In contrast, for areas where the goal is to eliminate transmission, the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment was more consistent. <strong>Conclusion</strong> Whether community-wide mass treatment is appropriate will depend on the local epidemiological setting (i.e. the relative pre-control burden in adults, and transmission intensity), and whether the goal is morbidity control or eliminating transmission. This has important implications regarding the generalisability of cost-effectiveness analyses of schistosomiasis interventions. Our results indicate that areas with poor school-enrolment/coverage could benefit more from community-wide treatment of praziquantel and should potentially be prioritised for any change in strategy. This work highlights the importance of not over-generalising conclusions and policy in this area, but of basing decisions on high quality epidemiological data and quantitative analyses of the impact of interventions in a range of settings. |
| spellingShingle | Turner, H Truscott, J Bettis, A Farrell, S Deol, A Whitton, J Fleming, F Anderson, R Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title | Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title_full | Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title_short | Evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community-wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis: Implications for future economic evaluations |
| title_sort | evaluating the variation in the projected benefit of community wide mass treatment for schistosomiasis implications for future economic evaluations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerh evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT truscottj evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT bettisa evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT farrells evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT deola evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT whittonj evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT flemingf evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations AT andersonr evaluatingthevariationintheprojectedbenefitofcommunitywidemasstreatmentforschistosomiasisimplicationsforfutureeconomicevaluations |