Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation.
Efficient T cell activation requires the engagement of a variety of ligand/receptor molecules in addition to T cell receptor (TCR)-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/peptide interactions. The leukocyte function antigen 1 (LFA-1) and the CD28 glycoprotein have both been implicated in T cell activ...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
1997
|
_version_ | 1797100038646661120 |
---|---|
author | Bachmann, M McKall-Faienza, K Schmits, R Bouchard, D Beach, J Speiser, D Mak, T Ohashi, P |
author_facet | Bachmann, M McKall-Faienza, K Schmits, R Bouchard, D Beach, J Speiser, D Mak, T Ohashi, P |
author_sort | Bachmann, M |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Efficient T cell activation requires the engagement of a variety of ligand/receptor molecules in addition to T cell receptor (TCR)-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/peptide interactions. The leukocyte function antigen 1 (LFA-1) and the CD28 glycoprotein have both been implicated in T cell activation. The present study dissects the roles of LFA-1 and CD28 in the activation of naive virus-specific CD8+ T cells. We demonstrate that LFA-1 facilitates T cell activation by lowering the amounts of antigen necessary for T cell activation. In the absence of LFA-1, 100-fold more antigen was required for T cell-antigen-presenting cell (APC) conjugation and all subsequent events of T cell activation, including TCR down-regulation, Ca2+-flux, T cell proliferation, and lytic effector cell induction. Thus, LFA-1 facilitates the functional triggering of TCRs by promoting adhesion of T cells to APCs but does not affect T cell activation otherwise. In contrast, CD28 played an entirely different role during T cell activation. CD28 reduced the number of TCRs that had to be triggered for T cell activation and allowed activation of T cells by low affinity ligands. CD28 but not LFA-1 prevented induction of T cell unresponsiveness after stimulation of TCRs. These results demonstrate that LFA-1 and CD28 exhibit distinct, nonoverlapping ways to influence T cell activation and suggest that the terms costimulation and signal 2 should be revisited. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:32:05Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:e29beebd-986b-481d-a954-f8ffe9fba836 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:32:05Z |
publishDate | 1997 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:e29beebd-986b-481d-a954-f8ffe9fba8362022-03-27T10:02:41ZDistinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e29beebd-986b-481d-a954-f8ffe9fba836EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1997Bachmann, MMcKall-Faienza, KSchmits, RBouchard, DBeach, JSpeiser, DMak, TOhashi, PEfficient T cell activation requires the engagement of a variety of ligand/receptor molecules in addition to T cell receptor (TCR)-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/peptide interactions. The leukocyte function antigen 1 (LFA-1) and the CD28 glycoprotein have both been implicated in T cell activation. The present study dissects the roles of LFA-1 and CD28 in the activation of naive virus-specific CD8+ T cells. We demonstrate that LFA-1 facilitates T cell activation by lowering the amounts of antigen necessary for T cell activation. In the absence of LFA-1, 100-fold more antigen was required for T cell-antigen-presenting cell (APC) conjugation and all subsequent events of T cell activation, including TCR down-regulation, Ca2+-flux, T cell proliferation, and lytic effector cell induction. Thus, LFA-1 facilitates the functional triggering of TCRs by promoting adhesion of T cells to APCs but does not affect T cell activation otherwise. In contrast, CD28 played an entirely different role during T cell activation. CD28 reduced the number of TCRs that had to be triggered for T cell activation and allowed activation of T cells by low affinity ligands. CD28 but not LFA-1 prevented induction of T cell unresponsiveness after stimulation of TCRs. These results demonstrate that LFA-1 and CD28 exhibit distinct, nonoverlapping ways to influence T cell activation and suggest that the terms costimulation and signal 2 should be revisited. |
spellingShingle | Bachmann, M McKall-Faienza, K Schmits, R Bouchard, D Beach, J Speiser, D Mak, T Ohashi, P Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title | Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title_full | Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title_fullStr | Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title_short | Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. |
title_sort | distinct roles for lfa 1 and cd28 during activation of naive t cells adhesion versus costimulation |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bachmannm distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT mckallfaienzak distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT schmitsr distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT bouchardd distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT beachj distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT speiserd distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT makt distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation AT ohaship distinctrolesforlfa1andcd28duringactivationofnaivetcellsadhesionversuscostimulation |