A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa
<br><strong>Background </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global research effort to build a body of knowledge that can inform mitigation strategies. We carried out a bibliometric analysis to describe the COVID-19 research output in Africa in terms of setting...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
| _version_ | 1797100121580634112 |
|---|---|
| author | Guleid, FH Oyando, R Kabia, E Mumbi, A Akech, S Barasa, E |
| author_facet | Guleid, FH Oyando, R Kabia, E Mumbi, A Akech, S Barasa, E |
| author_sort | Guleid, FH |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <br><strong>Background </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global research effort to build a body of knowledge that can inform mitigation strategies. We carried out a bibliometric analysis to describe the COVID-19 research output in Africa in terms of setting, study design, research themes and author affiliation.
<br><strong>
Methods</strong> We searched for articles published between 1 December 2019 and 3 January 2021 from various databases including PubMed, African Journals Online, medRxiv, Collabovid, the WHO global research database and Google. All article types and study design were included.
<br><strong>
Results </strong>A total of 1296 articles were retrieved. 46.6% were primary research articles, 48.6% were editorial-type articles while 4.6% were secondary research articles. 20.3% articles used the entire continent of Africa as their study setting while South Africa (15.4%) was the most common country-focused setting. The most common research topics include ‘country preparedness and response’ (24.9%) and ‘the direct and indirect health impacts of the pandemic’ (21.6%). However, only 1.0% of articles focus on therapeutics and vaccines. 90.3% of the articles had at least one African researcher as author, 78.5% had an African researcher as first author, while 63.5% had an African researcher as last author. The University of Cape Town leads with the greatest number of first and last authors. 13% of the articles were published in medRxiv and of the studies that declared funding, the Wellcome Trust was the top funding body.
<br><strong>
Conclusions </strong>This study highlights Africa’s COVID-19 research and the continent’s existing capacity to carry out research that addresses local problems. However, more studies focused on vaccines and therapeutics are needed to inform local development. In addition, the uneven distribution of research productivity among African countries emphasises the need for increased investment where needed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:33:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e3007ca2-fca5-44d0-82c6-04ee7c39b86b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:33:16Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e3007ca2-fca5-44d0-82c6-04ee7c39b86b2022-03-27T10:05:40ZA bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in AfricaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e3007ca2-fca5-44d0-82c6-04ee7c39b86bEnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2021Guleid, FHOyando, RKabia, EMumbi, AAkech, SBarasa, E<br><strong>Background </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global research effort to build a body of knowledge that can inform mitigation strategies. We carried out a bibliometric analysis to describe the COVID-19 research output in Africa in terms of setting, study design, research themes and author affiliation. <br><strong> Methods</strong> We searched for articles published between 1 December 2019 and 3 January 2021 from various databases including PubMed, African Journals Online, medRxiv, Collabovid, the WHO global research database and Google. All article types and study design were included. <br><strong> Results </strong>A total of 1296 articles were retrieved. 46.6% were primary research articles, 48.6% were editorial-type articles while 4.6% were secondary research articles. 20.3% articles used the entire continent of Africa as their study setting while South Africa (15.4%) was the most common country-focused setting. The most common research topics include ‘country preparedness and response’ (24.9%) and ‘the direct and indirect health impacts of the pandemic’ (21.6%). However, only 1.0% of articles focus on therapeutics and vaccines. 90.3% of the articles had at least one African researcher as author, 78.5% had an African researcher as first author, while 63.5% had an African researcher as last author. The University of Cape Town leads with the greatest number of first and last authors. 13% of the articles were published in medRxiv and of the studies that declared funding, the Wellcome Trust was the top funding body. <br><strong> Conclusions </strong>This study highlights Africa’s COVID-19 research and the continent’s existing capacity to carry out research that addresses local problems. However, more studies focused on vaccines and therapeutics are needed to inform local development. In addition, the uneven distribution of research productivity among African countries emphasises the need for increased investment where needed. |
| spellingShingle | Guleid, FH Oyando, R Kabia, E Mumbi, A Akech, S Barasa, E A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title | A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title_full | A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title_fullStr | A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title_short | A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa |
| title_sort | bibliometric analysis of covid 19 research in africa |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guleidfh abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT oyandor abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT kabiae abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT mumbia abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT akechs abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT barasae abibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT guleidfh bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT oyandor bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT kabiae bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT mumbia bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT akechs bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica AT barasae bibliometricanalysisofcovid19researchinafrica |