Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods

<p><strong>Purpose:&nbsp;</strong>Children learning to read in English must learn to read words with varying degrees of grapheme-phoneme correspondence regularity, but there is very little research comparing methods of instruction for words with less predictable or irregular sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colenbrander, D, Kohnen, S, Beyersmann, E, Robidoux, S, Wegener, S, Arrow, T, Nation, K, Castles, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis 2022
_version_ 1797111434406002688
author Colenbrander, D
Kohnen, S
Beyersmann, E
Robidoux, S
Wegener, S
Arrow, T
Nation, K
Castles, A
author_facet Colenbrander, D
Kohnen, S
Beyersmann, E
Robidoux, S
Wegener, S
Arrow, T
Nation, K
Castles, A
author_sort Colenbrander, D
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Purpose:&nbsp;</strong>Children learning to read in English must learn to read words with varying degrees of grapheme-phoneme correspondence regularity, but there is very little research comparing methods of instruction for words with less predictable or irregular spellings. Therefore, we compared three methods of instruction for beginning readers.</p> <p><strong>Method:&nbsp;</strong>Eighty-five Kindergarten children were randomly assigned to either Look and Say (LSay), Look and Spell (LSpell), mispronunciation correction (MPC), or wait-list control conditions. Children were taught 12 irregular words over three sessions. Amount of instructional time and number of exposures to the written and spoken forms of the words was controlled across the three experimental conditions. After training, children were assessed on reading aloud and orthographic choice measures.</p> <p><strong>Results:&nbsp;</strong>Children showed evidence of superior learning of trained words in the LSpell and MPC conditions, compared to LSay and control conditions. Differences between the LSpell and MPC conditions were not significant. There was no evidence of generalization to untrained items.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:&nbsp;</strong>Findings indicate that active processing of a word&rsquo;s orthography is crucial for learning irregular words. These results have implications for initial reading instruction. Further research is required to determine whether differences between LSpell and MPC conditions emerge after longer periods of training.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:10:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e372e2e5-7c7b-4d2c-aa5a-088880b70737
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:10:17Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e372e2e5-7c7b-4d2c-aa5a-088880b707372023-11-17T08:05:43ZTeaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methodsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e372e2e5-7c7b-4d2c-aa5a-088880b70737EnglishSymplectic ElementsTaylor and Francis2022Colenbrander, DKohnen, SBeyersmann, ERobidoux, SWegener, SArrow, TNation, KCastles, A<p><strong>Purpose:&nbsp;</strong>Children learning to read in English must learn to read words with varying degrees of grapheme-phoneme correspondence regularity, but there is very little research comparing methods of instruction for words with less predictable or irregular spellings. Therefore, we compared three methods of instruction for beginning readers.</p> <p><strong>Method:&nbsp;</strong>Eighty-five Kindergarten children were randomly assigned to either Look and Say (LSay), Look and Spell (LSpell), mispronunciation correction (MPC), or wait-list control conditions. Children were taught 12 irregular words over three sessions. Amount of instructional time and number of exposures to the written and spoken forms of the words was controlled across the three experimental conditions. After training, children were assessed on reading aloud and orthographic choice measures.</p> <p><strong>Results:&nbsp;</strong>Children showed evidence of superior learning of trained words in the LSpell and MPC conditions, compared to LSay and control conditions. Differences between the LSpell and MPC conditions were not significant. There was no evidence of generalization to untrained items.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:&nbsp;</strong>Findings indicate that active processing of a word&rsquo;s orthography is crucial for learning irregular words. These results have implications for initial reading instruction. Further research is required to determine whether differences between LSpell and MPC conditions emerge after longer periods of training.</p>
spellingShingle Colenbrander, D
Kohnen, S
Beyersmann, E
Robidoux, S
Wegener, S
Arrow, T
Nation, K
Castles, A
Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title_full Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title_fullStr Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title_full_unstemmed Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title_short Teaching children to read irregular words: a comparison of three instructional methods
title_sort teaching children to read irregular words a comparison of three instructional methods
work_keys_str_mv AT colenbranderd teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT kohnens teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT beyersmanne teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT robidouxs teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT wegeners teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT arrowt teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT nationk teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods
AT castlesa teachingchildrentoreadirregularwordsacomparisonofthreeinstructionalmethods