Living with moral disagreement

This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crisp, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer Verlag 2020

Similar Items