Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
Main Author: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
by: Schaefer, GO
Published: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
by: Knobe, Joshua, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
by: Vitor Sommavilla
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
by: Mogensen, A
Published: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
by: Reichardt Bastian
Published: (2015-09-01)