Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
المؤلف الرئيسي: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
حسب: Schaefer, GO
منشور في: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
حسب: Knobe, Joshua, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
حسب: Vitor Sommavilla
منشور في: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
حسب: Mogensen, A
منشور في: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
حسب: Reichardt Bastian
منشور في: (2015-09-01)