Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
1. Verfasser: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
Ähnliche Einträge
Ähnliche Einträge
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
von: Schaefer, GO
Veröffentlicht: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
von: Knobe, Joshua, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
von: Vitor Sommavilla
Veröffentlicht: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
von: Mogensen, A
Veröffentlicht: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
von: Reichardt Bastian
Veröffentlicht: (2015-09-01)