Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
Autor Principal: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
Títulos similares
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
por: Schaefer, GO
Publicado: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
por: Knobe, Joshua, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
por: Vitor Sommavilla
Publicado: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
por: Mogensen, A
Publicado: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
por: Reichardt Bastian
Publicado: (2015-09-01)