Living with moral disagreement

This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...

Descrición completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Crisp, R
Formato: Journal article
Idioma:English
Publicado: Springer Verlag 2020

Títulos similares