Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
מחבר ראשי: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
פורמט: | Journal article |
שפה: | English |
יצא לאור: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
פריטים דומים
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
מאת: Schaefer, GO
יצא לאור: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
מאת: Knobe, Joshua, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
מאת: Vitor Sommavilla
יצא לאור: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
מאת: Mogensen, A
יצא לאור: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
מאת: Reichardt Bastian
יצא לאור: (2015-09-01)