Living with moral disagreement

This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
第一著者: Crisp, R
フォーマット: Journal article
言語:English
出版事項: Springer Verlag 2020

類似資料