Living with moral disagreement
This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...
1. autor: | Crisp, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Język: | English |
Wydane: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
Podobne zapisy
-
Moral enhancement and moral disagreement
od: Schaefer, GO
Wydane: (2014) -
Moral Disagreement and Moral Semantics
od: Knobe, Joshua, i wsp.
Wydane: (2018) -
Moral subjectivism and the semantics of disagreements
od: Vitor Sommavilla
Wydane: (2023-12-01) -
Disagreements in moral intuition as defeaters
od: Mogensen, A
Wydane: (2016) -
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth
od: Reichardt Bastian
Wydane: (2015-09-01)