Living with moral disagreement

This paper argues that suspension of judgement is the appropriate response to disagreement about ultimate moral principles, and outlines the implications of such a response. It begins with an argument influenced by Sextus and Sidgwick for the rationality of suspension, and then illustrates fundament...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автор: Crisp, R
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Springer Verlag 2020

Схожі ресурси