Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

<h4>Background</h4> <p>Although psychological interventions are recommended for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD), there remains considerable uncertainty regarding their effectiveness. </p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richards, SH, Anderson, L, Jenkinson, CE, Whalley, B, Rees, K, Davies, P, Bennett, P, Liu, Z, West, R, Thompson, DR, Taylor, RS
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2017
Subjects:
_version_ 1797100284954017792
author Richards, SH
Anderson, L
Jenkinson, CE
Whalley, B
Rees, K
Davies, P
Bennett, P
Liu, Z
West, R
Thompson, DR
Taylor, RS
author_facet Richards, SH
Anderson, L
Jenkinson, CE
Whalley, B
Rees, K
Davies, P
Bennett, P
Liu, Z
West, R
Thompson, DR
Taylor, RS
author_sort Richards, SH
collection OXFORD
description <h4>Background</h4> <p>Although psychological interventions are recommended for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD), there remains considerable uncertainty regarding their effectiveness. </p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for CHD.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to April 2016. Retrieved papers, systematic reviews, and trial registries were hand-searched. We included RCTs with at least six months of follow-up, comparing the direct effects of psychological interventions to usual care for patients following myocardial infarction or revascularisation, or with a diagnosis of angina pectoris or CHD defined by angiography. Two authors screened titles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression was used to explore study-level predictors.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>35 studies with 10,703 participants (median follow-up 12 months) were included. Psychological interventions led to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.98), although no effects were observed for total mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularisation. Psychological interventions improved depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15), anxiety (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.09), and stress (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.24) compared with controls.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>We found that psychological intervention improved psychological symptoms, and reduced cardiac mortality for people with CHD. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these effects, and the specific techniques most likely to benefit people from different presentations of CHD.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:35:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e3bab3de-b3f0-4777-817d-7281e3b07e60
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:35:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e3bab3de-b3f0-4777-817d-7281e3b07e602022-03-27T10:11:16ZPsychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e3bab3de-b3f0-4777-817d-7281e3b07e60*subject*EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2017Richards, SHAnderson, LJenkinson, CEWhalley, BRees, KDavies, PBennett, PLiu, ZWest, RThompson, DRTaylor, RS <h4>Background</h4> <p>Although psychological interventions are recommended for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD), there remains considerable uncertainty regarding their effectiveness. </p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for CHD.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to April 2016. Retrieved papers, systematic reviews, and trial registries were hand-searched. We included RCTs with at least six months of follow-up, comparing the direct effects of psychological interventions to usual care for patients following myocardial infarction or revascularisation, or with a diagnosis of angina pectoris or CHD defined by angiography. Two authors screened titles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression was used to explore study-level predictors.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>35 studies with 10,703 participants (median follow-up 12 months) were included. Psychological interventions led to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.98), although no effects were observed for total mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularisation. Psychological interventions improved depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15), anxiety (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.09), and stress (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.24) compared with controls.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>We found that psychological intervention improved psychological symptoms, and reduced cardiac mortality for people with CHD. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these effects, and the specific techniques most likely to benefit people from different presentations of CHD.</p>
spellingShingle *subject*
Richards, SH
Anderson, L
Jenkinson, CE
Whalley, B
Rees, K
Davies, P
Bennett, P
Liu, Z
West, R
Thompson, DR
Taylor, RS
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions for coronary heart disease cochrane systematic review and meta analysis
topic *subject*
work_keys_str_mv AT richardssh psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT andersonl psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jenkinsonce psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whalleyb psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reesk psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daviesp psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bennettp psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuz psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT westr psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsondr psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taylorrs psychologicalinterventionsforcoronaryheartdiseasecochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis