Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.

There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamuya, D, Molyneux, C, Theobald, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
_version_ 1797100312787419136
author Kamuya, D
Molyneux, C
Theobald, S
author_facet Kamuya, D
Molyneux, C
Theobald, S
author_sort Kamuya, D
collection OXFORD
description There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:35:47Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e3d8968e-e1be-41a3-88e1-3f298dc5e228
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:35:47Z
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e3d8968e-e1be-41a3-88e1-3f298dc5e2282022-03-27T10:12:11ZGendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e3d8968e-e1be-41a3-88e1-3f298dc5e228EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2017Kamuya, DMolyneux, CTheobald, SThere is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.
spellingShingle Kamuya, D
Molyneux, C
Theobald, S
Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title_full Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title_fullStr Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title_full_unstemmed Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title_short Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice.
title_sort gendered negotiations for research participation in community based studies implications for health research policy and practice
work_keys_str_mv AT kamuyad genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice
AT molyneuxc genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice
AT theobalds genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice