A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.

BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Development of a validated clinical risk score at presentation to identify those at high risk of dying would enable patient triage and may help formulate early management strategies. METHODS: A clinical risk score was d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rahman, N, Kahan, B, Miller, R, Gleeson, F, Nunn, A, Maskell, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American College of Chest Physicians 2014
_version_ 1797100341524692992
author Rahman, N
Kahan, B
Miller, R
Gleeson, F
Nunn, A
Maskell, N
author_facet Rahman, N
Kahan, B
Miller, R
Gleeson, F
Nunn, A
Maskell, N
author_sort Rahman, N
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Development of a validated clinical risk score at presentation to identify those at high risk of dying would enable patient triage and may help formulate early management strategies. METHODS: A clinical risk score was derived based on data from patients entering the multicenter UK pleural infection trial (first Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial [MIST1], n=411). From 22 baseline clinical characteristics, model selection was undertaken to find variables predictive of poor clinical outcome. Outcomes were mortality at 3 months (primary), need for surgical intervention at 3 months, and time from randomization to discharge. The derived scoring system RAPID (renal, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors) was validated using patients enrolled in the subsequent MIST2 trial (n=191). RESULTS: Age, urea, albumin, hospital-acquired infection, and nonpurulence predicted poor outcome. Patients were stratified into low-risk (0-2), medium-risk (3-4), and high-risk (5-7) groups. Using the low-risk group as a reference, a RAPID score of 3 to 4 and >4 was associated with an OR of 24.4 (95% CI, 3.1-186.7; P=.002) and 192.4 (95% CI, 25.0-1480.4; P<.001), respectively, for death at 3 months. In the validation cohort (MIST2), a medium-risk RAPID score was nonsignificantly associated with mortality (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.8-13.2; P=.11), and a high-risk score was associated with increased mortality (OR, 14.1; 95% CI, 3.5-56.8; P<.001). Hospitalization duration was associated with increasing RAPID score (score 0-2: median duration=7, interquartile range 6-13; score>5: median duration=15, interquartile range 9-28, P=.08). CONCLUSIONS: The RAPID score may permit risk stratification of patients with pleural infection at presentation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:36:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e3f26666-be83-49b7-adc2-b282d034fecb
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:36:06Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American College of Chest Physicians
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e3f26666-be83-49b7-adc2-b282d034fecb2022-03-27T10:12:53ZA clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e3f26666-be83-49b7-adc2-b282d034fecbEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordAmerican College of Chest Physicians2014Rahman, NKahan, BMiller, RGleeson, FNunn, AMaskell, NBACKGROUND: Pleural infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Development of a validated clinical risk score at presentation to identify those at high risk of dying would enable patient triage and may help formulate early management strategies. METHODS: A clinical risk score was derived based on data from patients entering the multicenter UK pleural infection trial (first Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial [MIST1], n=411). From 22 baseline clinical characteristics, model selection was undertaken to find variables predictive of poor clinical outcome. Outcomes were mortality at 3 months (primary), need for surgical intervention at 3 months, and time from randomization to discharge. The derived scoring system RAPID (renal, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors) was validated using patients enrolled in the subsequent MIST2 trial (n=191). RESULTS: Age, urea, albumin, hospital-acquired infection, and nonpurulence predicted poor outcome. Patients were stratified into low-risk (0-2), medium-risk (3-4), and high-risk (5-7) groups. Using the low-risk group as a reference, a RAPID score of 3 to 4 and >4 was associated with an OR of 24.4 (95% CI, 3.1-186.7; P=.002) and 192.4 (95% CI, 25.0-1480.4; P<.001), respectively, for death at 3 months. In the validation cohort (MIST2), a medium-risk RAPID score was nonsignificantly associated with mortality (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.8-13.2; P=.11), and a high-risk score was associated with increased mortality (OR, 14.1; 95% CI, 3.5-56.8; P<.001). Hospitalization duration was associated with increasing RAPID score (score 0-2: median duration=7, interquartile range 6-13; score>5: median duration=15, interquartile range 9-28, P=.08). CONCLUSIONS: The RAPID score may permit risk stratification of patients with pleural infection at presentation.
spellingShingle Rahman, N
Kahan, B
Miller, R
Gleeson, F
Nunn, A
Maskell, N
A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title_full A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title_fullStr A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title_full_unstemmed A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title_short A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.
title_sort clinical score rapid to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmann aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT kahanb aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT millerr aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT gleesonf aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT nunna aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT maskelln aclinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT rahmann clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT kahanb clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT millerr clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT gleesonf clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT nunna clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection
AT maskelln clinicalscorerapidtoidentifythoseatriskforpooroutcomeatpresentationinpatientswithpleuralinfection