Ovarian follicular flushing as a means of increasing oocyte yield and in vitro embryo production in cattle

<p><strong>Context:&nbsp;</strong>The number of developmentally competent cumulus&ndash;oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved during Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) determines success in both bovine and human assisted reproduction. Follicular flushing for COC retrieval is practicsed widely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simmons, RJ, Tutt, DAR, Kwong, WY, Baroni, JI, Lim, LN, Cimpeanu, R, Castrejon-Pita, AA, Vatish, M, Svensson, P, Piegsa, R, Hagby, U, Sinclair, KD, Georgiou, EX
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2024
Description
Summary:<p><strong>Context:&nbsp;</strong>The number of developmentally competent cumulus&ndash;oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved during Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) determines success in both bovine and human assisted reproduction. Follicular flushing for COC retrieval is practicsed widely in humans but not in cattle.</p> <p><strong>Aims:&nbsp;</strong>To determine the benefits of follicular flushing in cattle and assess the merits of a novel 16G double-lumen needle (&lsquo;OxIVF&rsquo;) that flushes laterally to the needle shaft.</p> <p><strong>Methods:&nbsp;</strong>Experiment 1 flushed 655 antral follicles (&ge;7&nbsp;mm) from 255 abattoir-derived cattle ovaries. In Experiment 2, 12 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU in a cross-over design comparing both needle types. In Experiment 3, 11 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU using the OxIVF needle in a cross-over design: flushing (&ge;7&nbsp;mm follicles) vs a &lsquo;Hybrid&rsquo; approach of flushing (&ge;7&nbsp;mm follicles) and aspiration (5&ndash;7&nbsp;mm follicles); followed by two cycles of standard follicle aspiration (&gt;5&nbsp;mm follicles).</p> <p><strong>Key results:&nbsp;</strong>In Experiment 1, COC recovery was greater (<em>P</em>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.034) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (mean&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;s.e.; 74.1&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;2.10% vs 67.0&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;2.23%); yield of Grade 1 COCs was also greater (20.1&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;1.97% vs 8.2&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;1.38%;&nbsp;<em>P</em>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.001). In Experiment 2, recovery of COCs was greater (<em>P</em>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.045) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (89.1&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;2.98% vs 79.6&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;3.47%). Day 6 embryo yield was also greater (<em>P</em>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.017) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (87.2&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;4.38% vs 67.6&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;6.73%). In Experiment 3, recovery of COCs was greater (<em>P</em>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.033) for &lsquo;Flush&rsquo; vs &lsquo;Aspirate&rsquo; groups (82.1&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;5.06% vs 66.2&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;3.48%). However, number of Day 8 blastocysts for the &lsquo;Hybrid&rsquo; vs &lsquo;Flush&rsquo; approach (9.2&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;1.39&nbsp;vs 6.5&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;1.05 per cycle) did not reach statistical significance.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:&nbsp;</strong>Follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle, embracing the &lsquo;Hybrid&rsquo; approach, has the potential to increase oocyte retrieval and blastocyst number per donor cycle in cattle but requires further validation.</p> <p><strong>Implications:&nbsp;</strong>Larger scale studies will seek to confirm benefits of follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle in cattle. Future studies should consider applications in both equine and human assisted reproduction.</p>