Off-stage groups in Attic drama

<p>This thesis discusses the off-stage assemblies, populations, armies and other groups found in extant Athenian drama. It argues that such groups are often depicted as holding considerable power over events on stage. It demonstrates that extant plays take advantage of the fact that off-stage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hardwick, A
Other Authors: Budelmann, F
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
_version_ 1797112965580718080
author Hardwick, A
author2 Budelmann, F
author_facet Budelmann, F
Hardwick, A
author_sort Hardwick, A
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis discusses the off-stage assemblies, populations, armies and other groups found in extant Athenian drama. It argues that such groups are often depicted as holding considerable power over events on stage. It demonstrates that extant plays take advantage of the fact that off-stage groups can only be depicted from the viewpoints of on-stage characters by portraying groups and their psychology in highly nuanced fashion. In this regard, plays often undercut the stereotypes used in Athenian prose texts to depict the psychology of groups in political contexts.</p> <p>The introduction explains this thesis’ methodology and position relative to existing scholarship and explains how groups are defined. Chapter 1 surveys the stereotypical tropes which are used to portray group activity and thought in fifth- and fourth-century Athenian prose texts. Chapter 2 uses the assembly scenes in Euripides’ Suppliants, Aeschylus’ Suppliants and Euripides’ Orestes to discuss the portrayal of off-stage group decision-making in Attic tragedy. Chapter 3 analyses off-stage group decision-making as portrayed in Aristophanic comedy, covering Knights and Assembly-Women before applying these findings to Birds. Chapter 4 discusses amorphous groups whose role is not clearly defined in plot terms, focusing on Sophocles’ plays, and argues that such populations are made deliberately difficult for on-stage characters to read. Chapter 5 demonstrates how Euripides’ ‘Trojan’ plays and Sophocles’ Ajax encourage us to view the Achaean army as a shifting combination of democratic polis and menacing collective. Finally, Chapter 6 argues that groups of women in Bacchae, Hecuba, Thesmophoriazusae and Lysistrata are designed to resist straightforward categorisation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:37:33Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:e46e5114-77bf-48a8-89d9-5703243e1e6f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T03:55:31Z
publishDate 2021
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e46e5114-77bf-48a8-89d9-5703243e1e6f2024-03-11T09:16:01ZOff-stage groups in Attic dramaThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:e46e5114-77bf-48a8-89d9-5703243e1e6fSocial psychology in literatureGreek drama (Tragedy)EnglishHyrax Deposit2021Hardwick, ABudelmann, FBattezzato, LAllan, W<p>This thesis discusses the off-stage assemblies, populations, armies and other groups found in extant Athenian drama. It argues that such groups are often depicted as holding considerable power over events on stage. It demonstrates that extant plays take advantage of the fact that off-stage groups can only be depicted from the viewpoints of on-stage characters by portraying groups and their psychology in highly nuanced fashion. In this regard, plays often undercut the stereotypes used in Athenian prose texts to depict the psychology of groups in political contexts.</p> <p>The introduction explains this thesis’ methodology and position relative to existing scholarship and explains how groups are defined. Chapter 1 surveys the stereotypical tropes which are used to portray group activity and thought in fifth- and fourth-century Athenian prose texts. Chapter 2 uses the assembly scenes in Euripides’ Suppliants, Aeschylus’ Suppliants and Euripides’ Orestes to discuss the portrayal of off-stage group decision-making in Attic tragedy. Chapter 3 analyses off-stage group decision-making as portrayed in Aristophanic comedy, covering Knights and Assembly-Women before applying these findings to Birds. Chapter 4 discusses amorphous groups whose role is not clearly defined in plot terms, focusing on Sophocles’ plays, and argues that such populations are made deliberately difficult for on-stage characters to read. Chapter 5 demonstrates how Euripides’ ‘Trojan’ plays and Sophocles’ Ajax encourage us to view the Achaean army as a shifting combination of democratic polis and menacing collective. Finally, Chapter 6 argues that groups of women in Bacchae, Hecuba, Thesmophoriazusae and Lysistrata are designed to resist straightforward categorisation.</p>
spellingShingle Social psychology in literature
Greek drama (Tragedy)
Hardwick, A
Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title_full Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title_fullStr Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title_full_unstemmed Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title_short Off-stage groups in Attic drama
title_sort off stage groups in attic drama
topic Social psychology in literature
Greek drama (Tragedy)
work_keys_str_mv AT hardwicka offstagegroupsinatticdrama