Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
<p>Objective: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to CONSORT reporting guidelines, and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting.</p><p> Design: Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final pri...
Autors principals: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Publicat: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
_version_ | 1826301815858135040 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, B Burnett, P Moher, D Altman, D Salman, R |
author_facet | Wilson, B Burnett, P Moher, D Altman, D Salman, R |
author_sort | Wilson, B |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <p>Objective: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to CONSORT reporting guidelines, and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting.</p><p> Design: Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke RCTs with a 10-point truncated CONSORT reporting checklist, to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations, and independent associations with total CONSORT reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. Data sources: Random sample of stroke RCTs from the Cochrane Stroke Group’s Trial Register.</p><p> Eligibility criteria: Primary published report of the final results of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke RCTs, published in English in 1997-2016 inclusive.</p><p> Results: In this random sample of 177 stroke RCTs, the mean score on the truncated CONSORT checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997-2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001-2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010-2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher CONSORT score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of CONSORT reporting guidelines (p<0.001), journal endorsement of the CONSORT reporting guideline at the time of RCT publication (p<0.001), and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p=0.012).</p><p> Conclusions: Stroke RCT reporting to CONSORT standards has improved over time, but could be better. Journal endorsement and enforcement of CONSORT reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke RCTs.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:38:05Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:e49b9b95-e93d-4738-a682-0ac3dcc744b0 |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:38:05Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:e49b9b95-e93d-4738-a682-0ac3dcc744b02022-03-27T10:17:54ZCompleteness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e49b9b95-e93d-4738-a682-0ac3dcc744b0Symplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2018Wilson, BBurnett, PMoher, DAltman, DSalman, R<p>Objective: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to CONSORT reporting guidelines, and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting.</p><p> Design: Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke RCTs with a 10-point truncated CONSORT reporting checklist, to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations, and independent associations with total CONSORT reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. Data sources: Random sample of stroke RCTs from the Cochrane Stroke Group’s Trial Register.</p><p> Eligibility criteria: Primary published report of the final results of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke RCTs, published in English in 1997-2016 inclusive.</p><p> Results: In this random sample of 177 stroke RCTs, the mean score on the truncated CONSORT checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997-2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001-2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010-2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher CONSORT score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of CONSORT reporting guidelines (p<0.001), journal endorsement of the CONSORT reporting guideline at the time of RCT publication (p<0.001), and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p=0.012).</p><p> Conclusions: Stroke RCT reporting to CONSORT standards has improved over time, but could be better. Journal endorsement and enforcement of CONSORT reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke RCTs.</p> |
spellingShingle | Wilson, B Burnett, P Moher, D Altman, D Salman, R Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title_full | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title_short | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title_sort | completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke a systematic review |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonb completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT burnettp completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT moherd completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT altmand completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT salmanr completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview |