Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis
Moisture availability is a strong determinant of decomposition rates in forests worldwide. Climate models suggest that many terrestrial ecosystems are at risk from future droughts, suggesting moisture limiting conditions will develop across a range of forests worldwide. The impacts of increasing dro...
| Váldodahkkit: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Materiálatiipa: | Journal article |
| Giella: | English |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826312194132803584 |
|---|---|
| author | Jones, AG Clymans, W Palmer, DJ Crockatt, ME |
| author_facet | Jones, AG Clymans, W Palmer, DJ Crockatt, ME |
| author_sort | Jones, AG |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Moisture availability is a strong determinant of decomposition rates in forests worldwide. Climate models suggest that many terrestrial ecosystems are at risk from future droughts, suggesting moisture limiting conditions will develop across a range of forests worldwide. The impacts of increasing drought conditions on forest carbon (C) fluxes due to shifts in organic matter decay rates may be poorly characterised due to limited experimental research. To appraise this question, we conducted a meta-analysis of forest drought experiment studies worldwide, examining spatial limits, knowledge gaps and potential biases. To identify limits to experimental knowledge, we projected the global distribution of forest drought experiments against spatially modelled estimates of (i) future precipitation change, (ii) ecosystem total above-ground C and (iii) soil C storage. Our assessment, involving 115 individual experimental study locations, found a mismatch between the distribution of forest drought experiments and regions with higher levels of future drought risk and C storage, such as Central America, Amazonia, the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, equatorial Africa and Indonesia. Decomposition rate responses in litter and soil were also relatively under-studied, with only 30 experiments specifically examining the potential experimental impacts of drought on C fluxes from soil or litter. We propose new approaches for engaging experimentally with forest drought research, utilising standardised protocols to appraise the impacts of drought on the C cycle, while targeting the most vulnerable and relevant forests. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:23:52Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e4e2c9bf-ea0f-45c1-b64e-0f2b81cd0ca8 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:23:52Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e4e2c9bf-ea0f-45c1-b64e-0f2b81cd0ca82024-02-08T11:44:34ZRevaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e4e2c9bf-ea0f-45c1-b64e-0f2b81cd0ca8EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer Nature2021Jones, AGClymans, WPalmer, DJCrockatt, MEMoisture availability is a strong determinant of decomposition rates in forests worldwide. Climate models suggest that many terrestrial ecosystems are at risk from future droughts, suggesting moisture limiting conditions will develop across a range of forests worldwide. The impacts of increasing drought conditions on forest carbon (C) fluxes due to shifts in organic matter decay rates may be poorly characterised due to limited experimental research. To appraise this question, we conducted a meta-analysis of forest drought experiment studies worldwide, examining spatial limits, knowledge gaps and potential biases. To identify limits to experimental knowledge, we projected the global distribution of forest drought experiments against spatially modelled estimates of (i) future precipitation change, (ii) ecosystem total above-ground C and (iii) soil C storage. Our assessment, involving 115 individual experimental study locations, found a mismatch between the distribution of forest drought experiments and regions with higher levels of future drought risk and C storage, such as Central America, Amazonia, the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, equatorial Africa and Indonesia. Decomposition rate responses in litter and soil were also relatively under-studied, with only 30 experiments specifically examining the potential experimental impacts of drought on C fluxes from soil or litter. We propose new approaches for engaging experimentally with forest drought research, utilising standardised protocols to appraise the impacts of drought on the C cycle, while targeting the most vulnerable and relevant forests. |
| spellingShingle | Jones, AG Clymans, W Palmer, DJ Crockatt, ME Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title | Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title_full | Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title_short | Revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns, ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses: a meta-analysis |
| title_sort | revaluating forest drought experiments according to future precipitation patterns ecosystem carbon and decomposition rate responses a meta analysis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesag revaluatingforestdroughtexperimentsaccordingtofutureprecipitationpatternsecosystemcarbonanddecompositionrateresponsesametaanalysis AT clymansw revaluatingforestdroughtexperimentsaccordingtofutureprecipitationpatternsecosystemcarbonanddecompositionrateresponsesametaanalysis AT palmerdj revaluatingforestdroughtexperimentsaccordingtofutureprecipitationpatternsecosystemcarbonanddecompositionrateresponsesametaanalysis AT crockattme revaluatingforestdroughtexperimentsaccordingtofutureprecipitationpatternsecosystemcarbonanddecompositionrateresponsesametaanalysis |