Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nontechnical skills are "the cognitive, social and personal resource skills that complement technical skills, and contribute to safe and efficient task performance." Our research team developed and evaluated the task of developing and validating a behavioral marker system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Flowerdew, L, Brown, R, Vincent, C, Woloshynowych, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1797100591188541440
author Flowerdew, L
Brown, R
Vincent, C
Woloshynowych, M
author_facet Flowerdew, L
Brown, R
Vincent, C
Woloshynowych, M
author_sort Flowerdew, L
collection OXFORD
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nontechnical skills are "the cognitive, social and personal resource skills that complement technical skills, and contribute to safe and efficient task performance." Our research team developed and evaluated the task of developing and validating a behavioral marker system for the observational assessment of emergency physicians' nontechnical skills. METHODS: The development of the tool was divided into 3 phases and used triangulation of data from a number of sources. During phase 1, a provisional assessment tool was developed according to published literature and curricula. Phase 2 used analysis of staff interviews and field observations to determine whether the skill list contained any significant omissions. These studies were also used to identify behavioral markers linked to nontechnical skills in the context of the emergency department (ED) and establish whether skills included in the tool were observable. Phase 3 involved evaluating the content validity index of exemplar behaviors, using a survey of experts. RESULTS: A behavioral marker system was developed that comprised 12 emergency medicine-specific nontechnical skills, grouped into 4 categories. Content validity was assessed with a survey of 148 emergency medicine staff, and 75% of items achieved the recommended content validity index greater than 0.75. Data from the survey enabled further refinement of the behavioral markers to produce a final version of the tool. CONCLUSION: Although further evaluative studies are needed, this behavioral marker system provides a structured approach to the assessment and training of nontechnical skills in the ED.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:39:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e525cb9a-8a67-49c3-8f25-c20357f2e603
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:39:42Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e525cb9a-8a67-49c3-8f25-c20357f2e6032022-03-27T10:21:48ZDevelopment and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e525cb9a-8a67-49c3-8f25-c20357f2e603EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Flowerdew, LBrown, RVincent, CWoloshynowych, M STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nontechnical skills are "the cognitive, social and personal resource skills that complement technical skills, and contribute to safe and efficient task performance." Our research team developed and evaluated the task of developing and validating a behavioral marker system for the observational assessment of emergency physicians' nontechnical skills. METHODS: The development of the tool was divided into 3 phases and used triangulation of data from a number of sources. During phase 1, a provisional assessment tool was developed according to published literature and curricula. Phase 2 used analysis of staff interviews and field observations to determine whether the skill list contained any significant omissions. These studies were also used to identify behavioral markers linked to nontechnical skills in the context of the emergency department (ED) and establish whether skills included in the tool were observable. Phase 3 involved evaluating the content validity index of exemplar behaviors, using a survey of experts. RESULTS: A behavioral marker system was developed that comprised 12 emergency medicine-specific nontechnical skills, grouped into 4 categories. Content validity was assessed with a survey of 148 emergency medicine staff, and 75% of items achieved the recommended content validity index greater than 0.75. Data from the survey enabled further refinement of the behavioral markers to produce a final version of the tool. CONCLUSION: Although further evaluative studies are needed, this behavioral marker system provides a structured approach to the assessment and training of nontechnical skills in the ED.
spellingShingle Flowerdew, L
Brown, R
Vincent, C
Woloshynowych, M
Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title_full Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title_fullStr Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title_short Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' nontechnical skills.
title_sort development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians nontechnical skills
work_keys_str_mv AT flowerdewl developmentandvalidationofatooltoassessemergencyphysiciansnontechnicalskills
AT brownr developmentandvalidationofatooltoassessemergencyphysiciansnontechnicalskills
AT vincentc developmentandvalidationofatooltoassessemergencyphysiciansnontechnicalskills
AT woloshynowychm developmentandvalidationofatooltoassessemergencyphysiciansnontechnicalskills