Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education
Kim and Roth (this issue) purport to draw on the social-psychological theory of L. S. Vygotsky in order to investigate social relations in children’s argumentation in science topics. The authors argue that the argumentation framework offered by Stephen Toulmin is limited in addressing social relatio...
Main Author: | Erduran, S |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Springer
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”
by: Ben Hamby
Published: (2012-03-01) -
“Evaluate what I was taught, not what you expected me to know”: evaluating students’ arguments based on science teachers’ adaptations to Toulmin’s argument pattern
by: Lazarou, D, et al.
Published: (2020) -
The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument
by: Andrew Pineau
Published: (2013-12-01) -
ARGUMENTATION PATTERNS OF TOULMIN STUDENTS DURING ONLINE LECTURES IN THE PANDEMIC
by: Mohammad Archi Maulyda, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability
by: James B. Freeman
Published: (2008-02-01)